Journal Information
Vol. 91. Issue 4.
Pages 264-267 (01 October 2019)
Vol. 91. Issue 4.
Pages 264-267 (01 October 2019)
Scientific Letter
Open Access
Airway management in the neonate with Moebius syndrome
Manejo de la vía aérea en el neonato con síndrome de Moebius
Visits
6802
Giselle Cuestasa,
Corresponding author
giselle_cuestas@yahoo.com.ar

Corresponding author.
, Víctor Quirogab, Adrián Zanettab, Eliana Giménezb
a Sección de Endoscopia Respiratoria, División de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital General de Niños «Dr. Pedro de Elizalde», Buenos Aires, Argentina
b Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital Interzonal Especializado Materno Infantil «Don Victorio Tetamanti», Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (1)
Tables (1)
Table 1. Clinical manifestations, craniofacial anomalies, findings of endoscopic examination and video fluoroscopy swallow study, and treatment of patients with MS.
Full Text
Dear Editor:

Moebius syndrome (MS) is characterised by non-progressing congenital facial palsy and impaired ocular abduction due to involvement of the VII (facial) and VI (abducens) cranial nerves, respectively. Its prevalence is estimated at 1 in 125000 live births, with no difference between the sexes.1 The aetiology of MS is unknown; the disorder has been associated with genetic and environmental factors, such as foetal ischaemia and the use of drugs such as misoprostol during early pregnancy.2 Although it is widely known as MS, from the perspective of dysmorphology it would be more correctly termed as a sequence, as an initial change during embryonal development would result in a cascade of secondary events.

Moebius syndrome can be diagnosed early in the neonatal period. Its characteristic features are deficient sucking due to incomplete closure of the lips, the absence of a facial expression, incomplete closure of the eyelids during sleep, drooling and esotropia.1

Abnormalities in swallowing and breathing are frequent in newborns with this disease. Approximately 90% of these patients had craniofacial anomalies that predispose the newborn to airway obstruction.3

We made a retrospective review of the cases of 7 newborns (5 male) with MS managed at the department of otorhinolaryngology in the 2006–2018 period, analysing the clinical manifestations, the findings of endoscopy and the video fluoroscopic swallow study and the treatment received (Table 1).

Table 1.

Clinical manifestations, craniofacial anomalies, findings of endoscopic examination and video fluoroscopy swallow study, and treatment of patients with MS.

  P1  P2  P3  P4  P5  P6  P7 
Respiratory symptoms associated withdysphagiaa
Inspiratory stridor  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  Yes 
Sleep apnoea  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  No 
Respiratory distress  Severe  Severe  Severe  Mild  No  Mild  No 
Impaired sucking  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes 
Choking and coughing on oral feeding  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  No  Yes 
Drooling  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes 
Craniofacial abnormalities
Micrognathia  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  No 
Retrognathia  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  No 
Palate anomaly  Cleft palate  High-arched palate  Cleft palate  Submucous cleft palate  High-arched palate  Cleft palate  No 
Endoscopicfindingsb
Glossoptosis  Severe  Severe  Severe  Moderate  Mild  Mild  No 
Larynx  GER signs  GER signs  LM GER signs  GER signs  LM  Normal  LM 
Pharynx  Pharyngeal pooling  Pharyngeal pooling  Pharyngeal pooling  Small pharynx  Normal  Normal  Normal 
Findings of video fluoroscopic swallowstudyc
Nasal pharyngeal reflux  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes 
Impaired posterior containment  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes 
Residues  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes 
Penetration  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes 
Aspiration  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  No 
Gastro-oesophageal reflux  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes 
Treatment
Tracheotomy  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  No 
Pureed food  No  No  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes 
Gastrostomy  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  No  No  No 
Nissen fundoplication  Yes  No  Yes  No  No  No  No 

LM, laryngomalacia; MS, Moebius syndrome; P, patient.

GER signs: indirect signs of gastro-oesophageal reflux (arytenoid swelling and redness, congestion of the mucosa of the posterior pharyngeal wall).

a

Involvement of IX cranial nerve in P2 and P4, IX, X and XII cranial nerves in P1 and IX, X, XII and VIII cranial nerves in P3.

b

Vocal cord movement was normal in all patients.

c

Impaired posterior containment (bolus in hypopharynx more than 2s after start of pharyngeal phase), presence of residues (in pyriform sinuses, vallecula and pharyngeal walls), penetration (entry of bolus contents to laryngeal vestibule) and aspiration (passage of bolus contents to lower airway).

All the patients had strabismus and bilateral facial palsy (Fig. 1). Three patients (42.9%) had a history of maternal use of a drug use to induce abortion (misoprostol) in the first trimester of pregnancy. Three patients presented associated malformations: Poland syndrome in 1 (hypoplasia of the major pectoralis muscle) and Pierre-Robin sequence in 2 (retrognathia, cleft palate and glossoptosis).

Figure 1.

Newborn with bilateral facial palsy at rest (A) and during crying (B): (A) incomplete closure of eyelids (lagophthalmos). (B) Evident facial asymmetry during crying. “Mask face” with partial conservation of function of right inferior facial musculature (deviation of homolateral corner of the mouth). (C) Same patient featured in A and B at age 3 months with nasogastric and a tracheostomy tubes. Evidence of esotropia and low position of the ears. (D) Bilateral clubfoot.

(0.45MB).

The examination detected micrognathia, palate anomalies and glossoptosis in 6 patients (85.7%) and retrognathia in 3 (42.9%). The 3 patients that experienced severe respiratory distress underwent intubation with a Holinger anterior commissure laryngoscope by an ear, nose and throat (ENT) specialist with specific training in complex airway management in children, followed by performance of tracheotomy.

The video fluoroscopic swallow study revealed laryngeal penetration in all patients and lower airway aspiration in 3 (42.9%). All 7 patients underwent placement of a nasogastric tube in the first days of life. All received treatment for reflux and early swallowing rehabilitation.

Other findings included involvement of other cranial nerves (n=4), hypotonia (n=6), club foot (n=7), heart disease (n=2), chest and outer ear malformations (n=4).

The mean duration of follow-up was 6 years. Two patients still need tracheostomy and gastrostomy tubes and have language delay, autism and self-harming behaviours (P1 and P3). Another patient (P2) underwent decannulation at age 3 years, and at present can consume foods of any consistency by mouth and exhibits adequate cognitive functioning, as do the remaining patients.

The clinical picture of MS is heterogeneous. Its differential diagnosis must include various diseases that can cause facial paralysis: neonatal trauma (use of forceps), hereditary congenital facial paresis, myotonic dystrophy, infectious diseases (otitis, herpes zoster), various cancers or Guillain-Barré syndrome, among others.

As was the case in other published case series, we found a strong association between attempted termination of pregnancy with misoprostol and the subsequent birth of an individual with MS.2

Early rehabilitation of swallowing is essential. The combination of motor rehabilitation and dietary modification allow improvement in swallowing. In most cases, eating skills improve as the child grows. Gastrostomy is indicated in cases where safe and effective oral feeding cannot be achieved.

Retromicrognathia can cause posterior displacement of the tongue toward the pharynx (glossoptosis), obstructing the airway. Most patients respond to positional therapy, although extreme cases may require tracheotomy. At present, jaw distraction is the first-line treatment for this condition, as it prevents the need for tracheotomy and other, less effective procedures such as glossopexy.

Many children with MS require multiple surgeries, for instance, facial reconstructive surgery and/or surgical correction of strabismus. There is a high risk associated with the use of anaesthesia.4

Limited mouth opening, retromicrognathia, glossoptosis and cleft palate are frequent features in patients with MS that have been associated with failed or difficult intubation. In this patients, spontaneous ventilation should be considered with avoidance of muscle relaxants. Face masks with Guedel airways may be useful. Laryngeal mask airways and flexible bronchoscopy are alternative methods that should be available to patients.4–6

The management of children with MS requires a multidisciplinary team. Early rehabilitation is essential to optimise the recovery of the different impaired functions and improve outcomes and quality of life in these patients.

References
[1]
O. Picciolini, M. Porro, E. Cattaneo, S. Castelletti, G. Masera, F. Mosca, et al.
Moebius syndrome: clinical features, diagnosis, management and early intervention.
Ital J Pediatr, 42 (2016), pp. 56
[2]
G.P. Jotz, K. Schwarz.
The etiology of Möbius syndrome: a social problem?.
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 18 (2014), pp. 227-228
[3]
A.B. Hobaika, B.S. Neves, M.L. Fernandes, V.C. Guedes.
Anesthesia in a patient with moebius sequence: case report.
Rev Bras Anestesiol, 59 (2009), pp. 341-343
[4]
H. Arpaci, M. Kadioglu, A. Tuzuner-Oncul.
Anesthetic management of a case with Moebius syndrome.
Int J Exp Dent Sci, 1 (2012), pp. 37-39
[5]
I. Budić, D. Šurdilović, A. Slavković, V. Marjanović, M. Stević, D. Simić.
Moebius syndrome: challenges of airway management.
Acta Clin Croat, 55 (2016), pp. S94-S97
[6]
R. Poveda.
Secuencia de Moebius en anestesiología.
Rev Chil Anest, 41 (2012), pp. 140-143

Please cite this article as: Cuestas G, Quiroga V, Zanetta A, Giménez E. Manejo de la vía aérea en el neonato con síndrome de Moebius. An Pediatr (Barc). 2019;91:264–267.

Idiomas
Anales de Pediatría (English Edition)
Article options
Tools
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?