Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in children is a rare condition. It encompasses different clinical scenarios that require an individualized and multidisciplinary approach. The aim of this document is to provide a practical guideline for the management of pediatric VTE based on the best available evidence.
MethodsAn exhaustive literature review was performed, gathering information from current clinical guidelines and recent studies.
ResultThis document compiles the recommendations on the diagnosis and treatment of VTE in infants, children, and adolescents endorsed by the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (SEMI), the Spanish Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (SETH), and the Spanish Society of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology (SEHOP). Neonatal VTE, arterial thrombosis, and superficial venous thrombosis are beyond the scope of this work.
DiscussionThis document includes a list of definitions aimed at standardizing terminology and another two distinct sections: (1) particularities of treatment, including recommendations regarding dosing, monitoring and cautions in the pediatric population, and (2) particularities in management, including specific recommendations for the most frequent scenarios in children.
La enfermedad tromboembólica venosa (ETV) en la edad pediátrica es una entidad poco frecuente. Engloba diferentes escenarios clínicos que requieren de un seguimiento y tratamiento individualizado y multidisciplinar. El objetivo de este documento es que sirva de ayuda en el manejo de la ETV en la edad pediátrica basado en la mejor evidencia disponible.
MétodosSe realizó una revisión bibliográfica exhaustiva de cada uno de los aspectos tratados en el artículo y que agrupa la información de las diferentes guías clínicas disponibles y de estudios recientes.
ResultadosEn este documento se recogen las recomendaciones sobre el diagnóstico y tratamiento de la ETV en lactantes, niños y adolescentes avaladas por la Sociedad Española de Medicina Interna (SEMI), la Sociedad Española de Trombosis y Hemostasia (SETH) y la Sociedad Española de Hematología y Oncología Pediátricas (SEHOP). Quedan fuera del alcance del mismo la ETV en la época neonatal, así como la trombosis arterial y la trombosis venosa superficial.
DiscusiónEl documento incluye un listado de definiciones consensuadas con el objetivo de homogeneizar la terminología y otras dos partes diferenciadas: 1) las peculiaridades del tratamiento, que incluye las recomendaciones de dosificación y precauciones en el manejo y monitorización del tratamiento anticoagulante y 2) las peculiaridades del manejo, que resume las recomendaciones terapéuticas para aquellas entidades más frecuentes.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is rare in the pediatric population, but its incidence increases by a factor of 100–1000 in hospitalized patients (38–58 cases per 10 000 admissions), making it the second leading cause of acquired morbidity among pediatric inpatients.1 Its incidence exhibits a bimodal distribution, peaking in infancy and adolescence.2 In addition, it differs from VTE in the adult population in terms of its epidemiology, pathophysiology, risk factors (Table 1), and presentation. The main risk factor is the presence of a central venous catheter (CVC), which occurs in 90% of cases in neonates and more than 60% of non-neonatal pediatric cases,3 but the natural history of other presentations remains unclear.
Risk factors for venous thromboembolism in the pediatric population.
| Risk factors for deep vein thrombosis | ||
|---|---|---|
| Patient-related | Age: increased risk in patients aged < 1 month and >11years | |
| Hereditary thrombophilia | ||
| Anatomical abnormalities | ||
| Hospitalization-related | Central venous catheter | |
| Prolonged hospitalization | ||
| Admission to the intensive care unit | ||
| Major surgery | ||
| Severe trauma | ||
| Immobilization > 72 hours | ||
| Disease-related | Dehydration | Connective tissue disease |
| Infection/inflammation | ||
| Cancer | Sickle cell disease | |
| Congenital heart disease | Severe burns | |
| Intestinal failure | Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria | |
| Nephrotic syndrome | Metabolic disorders | |
| Antiphospholipid syndrome | Obesity | |
| Inflammatory bowel disease | ||
| Treatment-related | Corticosteroids | |
| Asparaginase | ||
| Estrogens | ||
| Other | Personal history of DVT | |
| Family history of DVT in a first-degree relative | ||
| Pregnancy | ||
| Tobacco use | ||
Abbreviations: DVT, deep vein thrombosis; VTE, venous thromboembolism.
There are specific clinical practice guidelines for pediatric patients.4–6 However, most of their recommendations are based on small case series, extrapolations from studies in adults, or expert opinions with a low level of evidence. Therefore, the management of VTE in pediatric patients requires an individualized and multidisciplinary approach.5
This consensus document, developed by experts from three scientific societies, aims to provide a tool for clinical decision-making in the management of VTE in pediatric patients, based on the best available evidence.
Material and methodsThis document is divided into two parts: it starts by reviewing the particularities of its management in the pediatric population and then provides treatment recommendations for the most common clinical manifestations. This document does not cover the management of VTE in newborns, arterial thrombosis, or superficial vein thrombosis. It also does not address the management of VTE in special clinical situations, such as in patients with cancer or congenital heart disease.7
The panel conducted a review of the literature, based on which it developed an initial draft. This draft underwent an internal consensus-building process among the panel members, using the most recent international guidelines as a reference.4 This work did not require review by an ethics committee, as it did not include any new research involving human subjects.
Definitions and conceptsTable 2 includes a list of consensus-based terms and definitions proposed by the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH).8–10
List of terms and definitions.
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| VTE | Pulmonary embolism (PE), extremity DVT, non-extremity DVT including neck, vena cava, intracardiac, intra-abdominal/pelvic, and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. |
| Provoked VTE | VTE confirmed by imaging and associated with an identifiable risk factor within the previous 30 days (eg, central venous catheter, adjacent infection, surgery, trauma, bed rest, recent hospitalization, cancer…) |
| Idiopathic (unprovoked) VTE | TEV confirmed by imaging in absence of a temporal or causal association with a known clinical risk factor. |
| Clinically Unsuspected VTE | VTE radiologically confirmed by imaging performed either as surveillance for risk of VTE (that is, aimed at identifying asymptomatic VTE), or for clinical issues unrelated to VTE (incidental finding), in the absence of any VTE-associated signs and symptoms |
| Recurrent VTE | Radiological evidence of recurrent VTE, including new site and VTE progression, relative to the study-qualifying imaging study for index VTE, accompanied by signs or symptoms corresponding to (and in temporal association with) the site of VTE. |
Abbreviations: VTE, venous thromboembolism; DVT, deep-vein thrombosis.
The peculiarities of treatment stem from the physiological differences in the hemostatic system during childhood, which are more pronounced in neonates and infants. These patients have physiologically lower levels of antithrombin, protein C, total protein S, contact factors, and vitamin K-dependent factors. Physiological differences in renal and hepatic metabolism also affect the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anticoagulant therapies. This explains the differences in recommended doses for the pediatric population (Table 3).11
Dosage and therapeutic drug monitoring of anticoagulant medications used in pediatric patients.
| Drug | Loading dose | Maintenance dose | Target | Clinical scenario | Dose adjustment | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UFH | 50−100 U/kg IV | <1year: 28 IU/kg/h | Anti-Xa 0.35−0.7 | Critically ill patient, severe kidney failure, moderate risk of bleeding, perioperative period, need of close monitoring | aPTT (in s)a | aPTT ratio | Anti-Xa | Approach |
| Consider not administering bolus if there is active bleeding or a high risk of bleeding | >1year: 20 IU/kg/h | aPTTa 60−85s (ratio 1.5−2.5) | ||||||
| <50” | <1.2 | <0.1 | bolus 50 U/kg, ↑ infusion 10% | |||||
| 50–59” | 1.2−1.4 | 0.1−0.34 | ↑ infusion 10% | |||||
| 60–85” | 1.5−2.5 | 0.35−0.7 | no change | |||||
| 86–95” | 2.6−3.0 | 0.71−0.89 | ↓ infusion 10% | |||||
| 96–120” | 3.1−3.5 | 0.9−1.2 | stop infusion 30min and ↓ 10% | |||||
| >120” | >3.5 | >1.2 | stop infusion 60min and ↓ 10% | |||||
| LMWH | Anti-Xa | Approach | Next control | |||||
| Enoxaparin | Preterm: 2mg/kg/12h SC | Anti-Xa 0.5−1 | Initial treatment in noncritical patients; inability to achieve or poor control of INR with VKAs; drug interactions or cancer | <0.35 | Increase by 25% | 4h after following dose | ||
| Term: 1.7mg/kg/12h SC | ||||||||
| <2 months: 1.5mg/kg/12h SC | ||||||||
| >2 months: 1mg/kg/12h SC | ||||||||
| 0.35−0.5 | Increase by 10% | 4h after following dose | ||||||
| 0.5−1 | No change | At 24h, 1 week and 1 month | ||||||
| 1−1.5 | ↓ 20% | Before next dose | ||||||
| 1.6−2 | Delay 3h and ↓ 30% | Before next dose and at 4hours | ||||||
| >2 | Suspend until anti-Xa 0.5 and ↓ 40% | Before next dose and, while >0.5, repeat every 12hours | ||||||
| / | <2 months: 150 U/kg/dose/12h SC | Anti-Xa 0.5−1 | Similar to enoxaparin | |||||
| >2 months: 100 U/kg/dose/12h SC | ||||||||
| Tinzaparin | <2 months: 275 U/kg/24h SC | Anti-Xa 0.5−1 | Similar to enoxaparin | |||||
| 2−12 months: 250 U/kg/24h SC | ||||||||
| 1−5 years: 240 U/kg/24h SC | ||||||||
| 5−10 years: 200 U/kg/24h SC | ||||||||
| 10−16 years: 175 U/kg/24h SC | ||||||||
| Bemiparin | <2 months: 197 IU/kg/24h | Anti-Xa 0.5−1 | Similar to enoxaparin | |||||
| 2−12 months: 163 IU/kg every 24h | ||||||||
| 1−5 years: 150 IU/kg every 24h | ||||||||
| 6−12 years: 126 IU/kg every 24h | ||||||||
| Fondaparinux | 0.1mg/kg/24h SC | Anti-Xa 0.5−1 | Similar to enoxaparin, but monitoring is performed 3hours after administration | |||||
| Acenocoumarol | Neonates | 0.2mg/kg/day | INR 2-3 (higher in situations with a high risk of thrombosis) | Medium- and long-term oral treatment | According to INR: | |||
| <1year | 0.1mg/kg/day | |||||||
| 1−5 years | 0.06mg/kg/day | |||||||
| 6−10 years | 0.05mg/kg/day |
| ||||||
| 11−18 years | 0.04mg/kg/day | |||||||
| Warfarin | < 1year | 0.34mg/kg/day | INR 2−3 (higher in situations with a high risk of thrombosis) | Medium- and long-term oral treatment | ||||
| 1−5 years | 0.19mg/kg/day | |||||||
| 6−10 years | 0.15mg/kg/day | |||||||
| 11−18 years | 0.14mg/kg/day | |||||||
| IDT | 0.75μg/kg/min in continuous infusion | HIT | Dose adjustment to achieve target aPTT 1.5−2.5 times the baseline value | |||||
| Argatroban | 0.2μg/kg/min (in the case of liver involvement) | Poor control with UFH | ||||||
| Bivalirudin | 0.125mg/kg IV over 1 h | 0.125−0.25mg/kg/h IV | HIT | Dose adjustment to achieve target aPTT 1.5−2.5 times the baseline value | ||||
| Poor control with UFH | ||||||||
| Systemic thrombolysis | rtPA; low-dose protocol: | Duration 6−12hours | See Table 4 | Management in the intensive care unit. | ||||
| Laboratory tests: complete blood count, aPTT, PT, fibrinogen, d-dimer every 6−12hours. | ||||||||
| Maintain fibrinogen > 1g/L and platelets > 50×109/L | ||||||||
| Imaging every 6−12hours (to assess response). | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
| Concomitant infusion of low-dose UFH (10 IU/kg/h) monitored with anti-Xa (target 0.1−0.3) | ||||||||
| Hemorrhagic complications: | |||||||
| ||||||||
| rtPA, high-dose protocol: 0.5−0.6mg/kg/h | Duration 6 hours | |||||||
| Local thrombolysis | rtPA: 0.01−0.03mg/kg/h (maximum 2mg/h) | Duration 72−96 hours | ||||||
| DOACs | Depends on age and weight (see Tables 1 and 2 in the Supplemental material) | Monitoring not required | Medium- and long-term oral treatment | Monitoring may be considered in special situations, such as suspected malabsorption, assessment of levels in patients with clinical bleeding, or when urgent surgery is required. | ||||
| Rivaroxaban | ||||||||
| Dabigatran | ||||||||
Abbreviations: DOAC, direct-acting oral anticoagulant; DTI, direct thrombin inhibitor; INR, international normalized ratio; IV, intravenous; LMWH, low-molecular-weight heparin; SC, subcutaneous; UFH, unfractionated heparin; VKA, vitamin K antagonist.
It has a very short half-life. It is the drug of choice when rapid reversal may be needed: patients admitted to intensive care units, patients recovering from major surgery, patients at high risk of bleeding, patients with kidney failure, etc.5,11
The dose depends on the age of the patient, and it requires close drug monitoring.5,11–13 In infants, its use should be individualized, as the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) does not always correlate to the anti-Xa level.
Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH)The LMWHs are the drugs of choice for initial treatment of VTE in noncritical pediatric patients.11 There are specific dosage recommendations for the pediatric population. Its efficacy is comparable to that of UFH, with low percentages of recurrence and clinically significant bleeding (<2%). Some of their advantages are that they can be administered subcutaneously, have predictable pharmacokinetics, and carry a lower risk of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT).11,12,14
Fondaparinux. Approved by the FDA for children aged more than 1year and weighing more than 10kg. Its efficacy and safety are comparable to those in adults, but caution is recommended in infants.11,12 Therapeutic levels can be achieved quickly with minimal adjustments, and the reported frequency of clot resolution exceeds 80%. It is indicated in the case of suspected HIT.
Parenteral direct thrombin inhibitorsBivalirudin and argatroban are possible alternatives for UFH (for example, in the case of suspected or confirmed HIT).11,15
Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs)For years, VKAs were the mainstay of oral anticoagulation. Currently, their use is limited to patients with advanced kidney failure, significant liver disease, or antiphospholipid syndrome, or when no other alternatives are available. They also require close monitoring.6 When using VKAs in children, it is important to consider physiological vitamin K deficiency beyond the neonatal period, as well as their interactions with food and other medication. Acenocoumarol is the most widely used VKA in Europe. Warfarin is useful in infants and in patients that experience significant fluctuations of the international normalized ratio (INR) while on acenocoumarol.
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)Rivaroxaban and dabigatran have been found to be as effective as conventional therapy, with a low incidence of major bleeding and clinically significant bleeding.16,17 They are approved for the treatment of VTE from birth through age 18 years. The current evidence supports their use in any type of VTE; however, following the initial diagnosis, the administration of parenteral anticoagulation for at least five days is recommended before initiating a DOAC. The dose depends on age and weight (Appendix B, Supplemental material Tables 1 and 2), and they do not require routine drug monitoring.6,18 There is specific information on the use of rivaroxaban in pediatric patients with CVST,19 CVC-related VTE,20 and cancer.21
Direct oral anticoagulants must be taken with food. Dabigatran capsules must not be opened, so caution is advised in patients with dysphagia. It also cannot be administered via a transpyloric tube.
Contraindications and precautionsThe contraindications for anticoagulants in pediatric patients are similar to those for adults and can be consulted in the summaries of product characteristics.11,12
- •
A basic coagulation panel, complete blood count, and kidney and liver function tests are recommended before starting treatment.
- •
UFH and LMWHs: contraindicated in patients with HIT or history of HIT.
- •
LMWHs: requires dose adjustment in patients with kidney failure.
- •
VKAs: contraindicated in the case of severe liver disease, drug interactions that keep the INR from remaining within the target range, pregnancy, or inability to monitor treatment.
- •
DOACs: avoid in the case of moderate-to-severe liver disease, severe renal impairment, concomitant treatment with potent CYP3A4 and/or P-glycoprotein inhibitors or inducers, pregnancy, breastfeeding, and antiphospholipid syndrome.18
Adverse effects
- •
All anticoagulants carry a risk of bleeding, but it is rare (<1%).13,16,17
- •
HIT is infrequent with UFH (<1%–2% of exposed patients). It is even less frequent with LMWHs. It is associated with a high mortality (20%–30%).
- •
There is evidence of an association between prolonged treatment with UFH or LMWHs and osteopenia and osteoporosis.
- •
VKAs can, in rare cases, cause skin necrosis, especially when administered to patients with protein C or protein S deficiency.
- •
Non-bleeding adverse effects of DOACs: vomiting and transient elevation of transaminases. Dabigatran is associated with dyspepsia and alopecia.
Thrombolytic therapy. Its use is reserved for exceptional situations such as life-threatening massive thrombosis, pulmonary embolism (PE) with hemodynamic instability, or cerebral venous thrombosis with neurologic impairment (Table 4).6 There are different dosing regimens (Table 3). The main complication of thrombolysis is bleeding (10%–20% of cases), which is associated with the duration of treatment and high doses.
Indications and absolute and relative contraindications for thrombolysis in the pediatric population.
| Strong indications for thrombolysis | Possible indications |
|---|---|
| Only in thrombosis lasting < 14 days | Occlusive, symptomatic iliofemoral or inferior vena cava DVT |
| Extensive venous thrombosis with total occlusion of venous flow, increased compartment pressures and compromise of arterial blood flow. | |
| Hemodynamically significant pulmonary embolism (with hypotension or shock; or resulting in right heart strain or necrosis). | |
| Superior vena cava syndrome. | |
| Bilateral renal vein thrombosis. | Catheter-related thrombosis in central veins in CVC-dependent patients |
| Congenital heart disease with shunt thrombosis. | |
| Consider in large (>2cm) pediculated and mobile right atrial thrombus. | |
| Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis with neurologic impairment and no improvement with anticoagulation or progressive thrombosis. | |
| Absolute contraindications | Relative contraindications |
| History of hemorrhagic stroke or stroke of unknown etiology | Transient ischemic attack in the past six months |
| Treatment with oral anticoagulants | |
| Ischemic stroke in the past six months | Currently pregnant or first week postpartum |
| Traumatic resuscitation | |
| Central nervous system tumor | Refractory hypertension |
| Advanced liver disease | |
| Recent head trauma or major surgery within the previous 3 weeks | Infectious endocarditis |
| Additional Contraindications | |
| Bleeding diathesis | Severe asphyxia in the past 7 days |
| Gastrointestinal hemorrhage in the past 2 months | |
| Active bleeding | Intracranial neoplasm, arteriovenous malformation, or aneurysm |
| Uncorrected hemorrhage | |
| Specific contraindications related to catheterization, including (but not limited to) a significant aneurysm or intimal injury in a systemic artery (aorta, femoral artery) |
Anticoagulation is the first-line treatment, but in the event of an absolute contraindication or treatment failure, there are alternatives whose use must be determined on a case-by-case basis by an experienced multidisciplinary care team.
Inferior vena cava filterIts use should be temporary, and there must be a clear plan for its retrieval once the contraindication to anticoagulation no longer exists. There are technical limitations: in patients weighing < 10kg, it cannot be placed due to the diameter of the vena cava. In addition, there is a risk of increased clotting, thrombosis within the filter, filter migration, and vein perforation.22
Thrombectomy. There are two modalities: open (surgical) and minimally invasive (catheter-assisted). The former is reserved for PE with hemodynamic compromise (see “pulmonary thromboembolism”), especially if systemic thrombolysis has failed or is contraindicated. Favorable outcomes have been reported in single cases and small case series, but it is associated with significant risks.4,6
Peculiarities of the management of VTE in pediatric patientsDecision to treat and selection of anticoagulant therapyThe decision to treat should take into account the clinical condition of the patient, the potential benefits (pain control, prevention of clinical extension or recurrence, and reduction of the risk of post-thrombotic syndrome [PTS]), and the risk of bleeding.
The key factors are the location of the VTE and the clinical manifestations.23 In patients with symptomatic VTE, initiating anticoagulation is recommended, especially in cases of proximal DVT, PE, occlusive thrombosis, or persistent risk factors (CVC, cancer, infection, etc).4 In contrast, for cases of clinically unsuspected thrombosis, the current evidence suggests a low risk of progression; therefore, the decision to initiate treatment should be individualized, taking into account the location (higher risk of persistence in femoral thrombosis), comorbidities, the need to maintain the CVC in cases of CVC-related VTE, and the importance of preserving the venous capital for future vascular access or for previous clots.24 If treatment is not initiated, the patient should be closely monitored, especially if a recent VTE is suspected (Fig. 1).
General management of pediatric venous thromboembolism (VTE) and recommendations regarding treatment duration.
Abbreviations: APS, antiphospholipid syndrome; CVC, central venous catheter; DOAC, direct-acting oral anticoagulant; LMWH, low-molecular-weight heparin; PE, pulmonary thromboembolism; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; UFH, unfractionated heparin; VKA, vitamin K antagonist.
The use of thrombectomy and thrombolysis (Table 4)25 is infrequent in pediatrics and their indication must be agreed on by a multidisciplinary care team.4,6
Duration of treatmentThe duration of treatment depends on the presence of a known trigger, the risk of recurrence, the resolution of the thrombosis, as well as other factors such as the characteristics of the patient and the thrombosis (Fig. 1).4,26,27 Indefinite treatment is not recommended in pediatric patients due to its impact on quality of life and the lack of evidence in support of it.4,6
Catheter-related VTEThe presence of a CVC is the main risk factor for VTE in the pediatric population.28 The decision to initiate treatment is based on the etiology and the presence of symptoms (Fig. 1). The decision not to treat can be considered in cases of unsuspected (asymptomatic) CVC-related VTE.4,6
With regard to the CVC, the management depends on whether it is a functioning CVC and the treatment needs to continue (Fig. 2). To reduce the risk of embolic phenomena, it is recommended to delay removal until at least 48hours of anticoagulation have been delivered, especially in patients with extensive thrombosis or with right-to-left shunts.6,28
Management of central venous catheter-associated thrombosis, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism.
Abbreviations: BNP, B-type natriuretic peptide; CVC, central venous catheter; DVT, deep vein thrombosis; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; PE, pulmonary embolism; RV, right ventricle; UFH, unfractionated heparin.
A watchful waiting approach is recommended for CVC-associated superficial venous thrombosis of the upper extremities.4 However, anticoagulation should be considered in cases of symptomatic thrombosis associated with a peripherally inserted central catheter.
Cerebral venous sinus thrombosisCerebral venous sinus thrombosis is a rare and heterogeneous condition (1.1 per 100 000 children per year) that is associated with permanent neurological sequelae in up to 35% of cases. Head and neck infections (mastoiditis or sinusitis) are the most frequent cause, but it has also been reported in the context of cancer (related to chemotherapy), autoimmune and inflammatory diseases, and congenital or acquired prothrombotic conditions. Its clinical presentation varies, ranging from mild headache to seizures, altered level of consciousness, focal neurologic deficits, or signs of intracranial hypertension.29
International guidelines recommend the use of anticoagulation in pediatric patients with CVST with or without associated bleeding (secondary to a complication of CVST, not due to other causes), but there are situations in which anticoagulation must be individualized due to a high risk of bleeding: newborn infant, CVST associated with infection (requiring surgery), trauma, a history of neurosurgery, or cancer.4,6,29
Thrombolysis is not recommended in pediatric patients. It may be considered in the case of an ischemic event or if there is neurologic deterioration despite anticoagulation. Mechanical thrombectomy may be considered depending on the experience and resources of the facility.4,6
Pulmonary embolismAlthough underreported, PE is rare in the pediatric population (5.1–9.2 per 10 000 intensive care unit admissions). Its significance lies in the associated mortality (9%–10%) and the high recurrence rate (up to 12.5%).3,6
Pulmonary embolism can result from a circulating clot or from in situ pulmonary artery thrombosis secondary to local causes, such as congenital heart disease. In addition to the previously described risk factors (Table 1), there are peculiarities in adolescents: a higher incidence of unprovoked PE and greater prevalence of hereditary thrombophilia, as well as other risk factors such as obesity, hormonal contraception, autoinflammatory diseases, or anatomical predisposition (see “thrombosis secondary to anatomical abnormalities”).30
The diagnosis is not always straightforward, either because the patient reports nonspecific symptoms (shortness of breath, anxiety, pleurisy, or cough), or because, despite the presence of florid symptoms, PE is not included in the differential diagnosis due to its rarity. Acute and severe forms are characterized by varying degrees of pulmonary artery obstruction, pulmonary hypertension, and acute right-sided heart failure or dysfunction, which may progress to left-sided heart failure, obstructive shock, and cardiac arrest. Less severe forms present with mild, often self-limiting signs and symptoms that may be attributed to another condition.30
Early initiation of treatment is associated with a reduced mortality. The therapeutic approach depends on the patient’s hemodynamic status and the presence of cardiac dysfunction; therefore, performing an urgent echocardiogram and laboratory tests (including troponin) is essential. Although anticoagulation is the first-line treatment in the vast majority of cases, decisions regarding thrombolysis and thrombectomy in specific situations should be made jointly by a multidisciplinary care team (Fig. 2).4,6,30
Intracardiac thrombosisIntracardiac thrombosis is rare in children, but it is associated with increased morbidity and mortality (10%–15%, although this is related to the presence of an underlying condition). It is associated with the use of CVCs, congenital or acquired heart disease, dilated cardiomyopathy, hypercoagulable states, and cancer.31
Transthoracic echocardiography is the imaging modality of choice for initial diagnosis. Transesophageal echocardiography offers a greater sensitivity (for example, in congenital heart disease). In complex cases or when visualization is inadequate, CT angiography may be useful (Fig. 3).32
The decision whether to treat or not to treat depends on the risk of thrombosis or bleeding.4 Anticoagulation is recommended as the treatment of choice in patients at high risk of thrombosis: a thrombus ≥ 2cm in size or occupying a large portion of the atrium, mobile or pedunculated, associated with a functioning CVC that cannot be removed or with evidence of progression in a patient with low bleeding risk (Fig. 3).4–6,32 Thrombolysis or thrombectomy should be reserved for exceptional situations (life-threatening hemodynamic instability) at experienced facilities.4,6
Portal vein thrombosisPortal vein thrombosis is a rare event. In pediatrics, it is usually associated with abdominal surgery (liver transplantation, splenectomy), sepsis, and prothrombotic conditions (such as thrombophilia or sickle cell disease).33 Its management depends on the extent and impact of the thrombosis. Anticoagulation is not generally recommended, and it is reserved for obstructive thrombosis, post-liver transplant thrombosis, or idiopathic thrombosis (Fig. 3).4 Spontaneous resolution without treatment has been reported in 30% to 70% of cases, but complications such as hepatic lobe atrophy, portal hypertension, cavernomatous transformation of the portal vein, and esophageal varices have also been reported.33
Splenic and mesenteric vein thrombosisSplenic and mesenteric vein thrombosis are extremely rare conditions. They are associated with pancreatitis, surgery, trauma, and the use of oral contraceptives.34 Anticoagulation is associated with a recanalization rate of 55% (compared to 29% without treatment), a low incidence of bleeding (3.8%), and a reduced mortality.35 There is insufficient evidence to support thrombolysis.34
Thrombosis secondary to anatomical abnormalitiesThoracic outlet syndrome is caused by the compression of the left subclavian vein at the level of the costoclavicular passage. In adolescents, it is associated with sporting activities (swimming, volleyball) due to hypertrophy of the scalene or subclavian muscles, but it may also result from the presence of a cervical rib or other causes. The management focuses on recanalizing the vessel and reducing the size of the thrombus, definitive treatment with surgical decompression, preventing recurrence and PE, and facilitating resumption of athletic activity (Fig. 3).36 Acute phase (0–14 days): consider catheter-directed thrombolysis or mechanical thrombectomy. Subacute or chronic phase (>14 days): consider staged endovascular recanalization and planning for surgical decompression (resection of the first rib and/or scalene resection or venolysis).37 There is a high risk of rethrombosis if the anatomical cause is not resolved.
May-Thurner syndrome is an anatomical variant that results in the compression of the left iliac vein against the lumbar spine by the overlying right iliac artery. Anticoagulation is indicated in the presence of associated thrombosis, but will not resolve the venous occlusion secondary to the anatomical abnormality (Fig. 3).38 Thrombolysis or thrombectomy should be considered in cases with acute iliofemoral VTE and significant limb compromise (severe pain/swelling, risk of loss of function or phlegmasia) to reduce the risk of PTS. Endovascular revascularization (angioplasty with/without stent placement) may be indicated in the presence of significant compression and persistent symptoms or recurrent thrombosis despite anticoagulation.38
Post-thrombotic syndromePost-thrombotic syndrome is a chronic complication that can develop following a VTE. It affects mobility and limits physical activity and activities of daily living, with an impact on quality of life. The symptoms vary according to the affected territory: in the extremities, pain, swelling, skin changes, ulceration, pruritus, paresthesia, nighttime cramps, venous claudication; in PE, chronic dyspnea, limitation of aerobic activities, impaired pulmonary or heart function, chronic pulmonary hypertension; in portal vein thrombosis, portal hypertension and gastroesophageal varices.9,39 Its etiology is multifactorial (Appendix B, Supplemental material, Fig. 1)39 and its frequency varies from series to series (26% in a systematic review, higher in prospective studies). Individualized follow-up is recommended for high-risk patients (unresolved VTE, cancer, portal vein thrombosis).4,39
The diagnosis is based on the evaluation of signs and symptoms (Table 5).9,39,40 The usefulness of various therapeutic strategies, such as the use of elastic compression stocking with moderate pressure, physical therapy, and supervised exercise, is still under debate.40
Components of standardized outcome measures for post-thrombotic syndrome: modified Villalta scale and Manco-Johnson instrument.
| Modified Villalta scale | Manco-Johnson instrument | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Components | Scoring | Components | Scoring |
| Symptomsa: | Signs: | ||
| Pain or abnormal use | 1 point (if present) | Edema | 1 point (if present) |
| Swelling | 1 point (if present) | Dilated superficial collateral veins | 1 point (if present) |
| Venous stasis dermatitis | 1 point (if present) | ||
| Venous stasis ulcers | 1 point (if present) | ||
| Signs: | Symptoms: | ||
| Hyperpigmentation | 1 point (if present) | Chronic lower-extremity pain | |
| Increased limb circumferenceb | 1 point (if present) | Limiting aerobic activities | 1 point (if present) |
| Pitting edema | 1 point (if present) | Limiting activities of daily living | 1 point (if present) |
| Venous collaterals on skin | 1 point (if present) | At rest | 1 point (if present) |
| Pigmentation of skin | 1 point (if present) | ||
| Tenderness on palpation | 1 point (if present) | ||
| Head swelling | 1 (moderate) or 2 (severe) | ||
| Varicosities | 1 (moderate) or 2 (severe) | ||
| Venous ulcer | 9 points (if present) | ||
| Classification of PTS: | Classification of PTS: | ||
| Absent PTS | 0 points | Absent PTS | 0 points |
| Mild PTS | 1−3 points | PTS of some degree present | ≥ 1 points |
| Moderate PTS | 4−8 points | Physically and functionally significant PTS | ≥ 1 sign and ≥ 1 symptom |
| Severe PTS | ≥ 8 points | ||
CAPTSure tool: assesses physical signs and symptoms reported by patients and caregivers with high reliability; culturally adapted versions are available.
PODCI: assesses the functional impact of PTS on the daily life of the child.
Although its incidence is increasing, VTE continues to be relatively rare in the pediatric population, and it encompasses multiple conditions that are managed with different diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Several international guidelines agree that the main limitation in the management of pediatric VTE is the scarcity and low quality of the available evidence.4–6 Therefore, they conclude that the management of pediatric VTE should be led by experienced pediatric hematology specialists or by a multidisciplinary care team under the supervision of an expert in the field.5
This document synthesizes the best available evidence and provides concise information with the aim of facilitating decision-making in the management of VTE in pediatric patients, in order to improve their prognosis and reduce medium- and long-term complications.
CRediT authorship contribution statementThe three lead authors (RB, MF, and PRA) conceived, coordinated and reviewed the study, integrating and harmonizing all the information provided by the contributors (HCP, FC, MGdC, LG, SI, BA, RL, SOV, GPP).
Declaration of Generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing processNo generative AIs or AI-assisted technologies were used in the development of the study, the analysis of the data or the writing of the manuscript.
FundingThis research project did not receive specific financial support from funding agencies in the public, private or not-for-profit sectors.
The authors declare having no conflicts of interest.










