Suggestions
Idioma
Journal Information
Cite
Cite
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Visits
113
Spanish Association of Paediatrics
Full text access
Available online 8 July 2026

Diagnosis and treatment of venous thromboembolic disease in children. Recommendations from the Thromboembolic Disease Working Group of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (SEMI), the Spanish Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (SETH) and the Spanish Society of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology (SEHOP)

Diagnóstico y tratamiento de la enfermedad tromboembólica venosa en la edad pediátrica. Recomendaciones del grupo de enfermedad tromboembólica de la Sociedad Española de Medicina Interna (SEMI), de la Sociedad Española de Trombosis y Hemostasia (SETH) y la Sociedad Española de Hematología y Oncología Pediátricas (SEHOP)
Visits
113
Rubén Berruecoa, María Falcónb, Bienvenida Argilésc, Heidy J. Campo Palaciod, Francisco J. Climente, María del Carmen Gómez del Castillof, Leticia Guiradog, Sara Izquierdoc, Ricardo López-Almarazh, Sonia Otálora Valderramag, Gabriel Puche Palaog, Pedro Ruiz-Artachoi,
Corresponding author
pruiza@unav.es

Corresponding author.
a Servicio de Hematología Pediátrica, Hospital San Joan de Déu, Sant Joan de Déu 2. Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu de Barcelona (IRSJD), Barcelona, Spain
b Servicio de Hematología, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular Materno Infantil de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
c Unidad de Hemato-Oncología Pediátrica, Servicio de Pediatría del Hospital Politécnico y Universitario La FE-Valencia, Valencia, Spain
d Servicio de Hematología y Hemoterapia, Hospital Materno Infantil. Hospital Regional Universitario, Málaga, Spain
e Unidad Patología Crónica Compleja, Hospital Universitario La Paz. Instituto de Investigación del Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain
f Servicio de Hematología y Hemoterapia, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain
g Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca. Unidad Avanzada de Enfermedad Tromboembólica Venosa, Murcia, Spain
h Unidad de Hemato-Oncología Pediátrica, Hospital Universitario de Cruces e Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria BioBizkaia, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain
i Departamento de Medicina Interna, Clínica Universidad de Navarra. Interdisciplinar Teragnosis and Radiosomics Research Group (INTRA Madrid), Universidad de Navarra. CIBER Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain
Ver más
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (3)
fig0005
fig0010
fig0015
Tables (5)
Table 1. Risk factors for venous thromboembolism in the pediatric population.
Tables
Table 2. List of terms and definitions.
Tables
Table 3. Dosage and therapeutic drug monitoring of anticoagulant medications used in pediatric patients.
Tables
Table 4. Indications and absolute and relative contraindications for thrombolysis in the pediatric population.
Tables
Table 5. Components of standardized outcome measures for post-thrombotic syndrome: modified Villalta scale and Manco-Johnson instrument.
Tables
Additional material (1)
Abstract
Introduction

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in children is a rare condition. It encompasses different clinical scenarios that require an individualized and multidisciplinary approach. The aim of this document is to provide a practical guideline for the management of pediatric VTE based on the best available evidence.

Methods

An exhaustive literature review was performed, gathering information from current clinical guidelines and recent studies.

Result

This document compiles the recommendations on the diagnosis and treatment of VTE in infants, children, and adolescents endorsed by the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (SEMI), the Spanish Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (SETH), and the Spanish Society of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology (SEHOP). Neonatal VTE, arterial thrombosis, and superficial venous thrombosis are beyond the scope of this work.

Discussion

This document includes a list of definitions aimed at standardizing terminology and another two distinct sections: (1) particularities of treatment, including recommendations regarding dosing, monitoring and cautions in the pediatric population, and (2) particularities in management, including specific recommendations for the most frequent scenarios in children.

Keywords:
Anticoagulation
Children
Thromboembolic disease
Venous thromboembolism
Embolectomy
Thrombolysis
Deep venous thrombosis
Resumen
Introducción

La enfermedad tromboembólica venosa (ETV) en la edad pediátrica es una entidad poco frecuente. Engloba diferentes escenarios clínicos que requieren de un seguimiento y tratamiento individualizado y multidisciplinar. El objetivo de este documento es que sirva de ayuda en el manejo de la ETV en la edad pediátrica basado en la mejor evidencia disponible.

Métodos

Se realizó una revisión bibliográfica exhaustiva de cada uno de los aspectos tratados en el artículo y que agrupa la información de las diferentes guías clínicas disponibles y de estudios recientes.

Resultados

En este documento se recogen las recomendaciones sobre el diagnóstico y tratamiento de la ETV en lactantes, niños y adolescentes avaladas por la Sociedad Española de Medicina Interna (SEMI), la Sociedad Española de Trombosis y Hemostasia (SETH) y la Sociedad Española de Hematología y Oncología Pediátricas (SEHOP). Quedan fuera del alcance del mismo la ETV en la época neonatal, así como la trombosis arterial y la trombosis venosa superficial.

Discusión

El documento incluye un listado de definiciones consensuadas con el objetivo de homogeneizar la terminología y otras dos partes diferenciadas: 1) las peculiaridades del tratamiento, que incluye las recomendaciones de dosificación y precauciones en el manejo y monitorización del tratamiento anticoagulante y 2) las peculiaridades del manejo, que resume las recomendaciones terapéuticas para aquellas entidades más frecuentes.

Palabras clave:
Anticoagulación
Pediatría
Enfermedad tromboembólica venosa
Tromboembolismo venoso
Embolectomía
Trombólisis
Trombosis venosa profunda
Full Text
Introduction

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is rare in the pediatric population, but its incidence increases by a factor of 100–1000 in hospitalized patients (38–58 cases per 10 000 admissions), making it the second leading cause of acquired morbidity among pediatric inpatients.1 Its incidence exhibits a bimodal distribution, peaking in infancy and adolescence.2 In addition, it differs from VTE in the adult population in terms of its epidemiology, pathophysiology, risk factors (Table 1), and presentation. The main risk factor is the presence of a central venous catheter (CVC), which occurs in 90% of cases in neonates and more than 60% of non-neonatal pediatric cases,3 but the natural history of other presentations remains unclear.

Table 1.

Risk factors for venous thromboembolism in the pediatric population.

Risk factors for deep vein thrombosis
Patient-relatedAge: increased risk in patients aged < 1 month and >11years
Hereditary thrombophilia
Anatomical abnormalities
Hospitalization-relatedCentral venous catheter
Prolonged hospitalization
Admission to the intensive care unit
Major surgery
Severe trauma
Immobilization > 72 hours
Disease-relatedDehydration  Connective tissue disease
Infection/inflammation 
Cancer  Sickle cell disease 
Congenital heart disease  Severe burns 
Intestinal failure  Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria 
Nephrotic syndrome  Metabolic disorders 
Antiphospholipid syndrome  Obesity
Inflammatory bowel disease 
Treatment-relatedCorticosteroids
Asparaginase
Estrogens
OtherPersonal history of DVT
Family history of DVT in a first-degree relative
Pregnancy
Tobacco use

Abbreviations: DVT, deep vein thrombosis; VTE, venous thromboembolism.

There are specific clinical practice guidelines for pediatric patients.4–6 However, most of their recommendations are based on small case series, extrapolations from studies in adults, or expert opinions with a low level of evidence. Therefore, the management of VTE in pediatric patients requires an individualized and multidisciplinary approach.5

This consensus document, developed by experts from three scientific societies, aims to provide a tool for clinical decision-making in the management of VTE in pediatric patients, based on the best available evidence.

Material and methods

This document is divided into two parts: it starts by reviewing the particularities of its management in the pediatric population and then provides treatment recommendations for the most common clinical manifestations. This document does not cover the management of VTE in newborns, arterial thrombosis, or superficial vein thrombosis. It also does not address the management of VTE in special clinical situations, such as in patients with cancer or congenital heart disease.7

The panel conducted a review of the literature, based on which it developed an initial draft. This draft underwent an internal consensus-building process among the panel members, using the most recent international guidelines as a reference.4 This work did not require review by an ethics committee, as it did not include any new research involving human subjects.

Definitions and concepts

Table 2 includes a list of consensus-based terms and definitions proposed by the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH).8–10

Table 2.

List of terms and definitions.

Term  Definition 
VTE  Pulmonary embolism (PE), extremity DVT, non-extremity DVT including neck, vena cava, intracardiac, intra-abdominal/pelvic, and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. 
Provoked VTE  VTE confirmed by imaging and associated with an identifiable risk factor within the previous 30 days (eg, central venous catheter, adjacent infection, surgery, trauma, bed rest, recent hospitalization, cancer…) 
Idiopathic (unprovoked) VTE  TEV confirmed by imaging in absence of a temporal or causal association with a known clinical risk factor. 
Clinically Unsuspected VTE  VTE radiologically confirmed by imaging performed either as surveillance for risk of VTE (that is, aimed at identifying asymptomatic VTE), or for clinical issues unrelated to VTE (incidental finding), in the absence of any VTE-associated signs and symptoms 
Recurrent VTE  Radiological evidence of recurrent VTE, including new site and VTE progression, relative to the study-qualifying imaging study for index VTE, accompanied by signs or symptoms corresponding to (and in temporal association with) the site of VTE. 

Abbreviations: VTE, venous thromboembolism; DVT, deep-vein thrombosis.

Peculiarities of the treatment of VTE in pediatric patients

The peculiarities of treatment stem from the physiological differences in the hemostatic system during childhood, which are more pronounced in neonates and infants. These patients have physiologically lower levels of antithrombin, protein C, total protein S, contact factors, and vitamin K-dependent factors. Physiological differences in renal and hepatic metabolism also affect the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anticoagulant therapies. This explains the differences in recommended doses for the pediatric population (Table 3).11

Table 3.

Dosage and therapeutic drug monitoring of anticoagulant medications used in pediatric patients.

Drug  Loading dose  Maintenance dose  Target  Clinical scenario  Dose adjustment
UFH50−100 U/kg IV  <1year: 28 IU/kg/h  Anti-Xa 0.35−0.7  Critically ill patient, severe kidney failure, moderate risk of bleeding, perioperative period, need of close monitoringaPTT (in s)aaPTT ratioAnti-XaApproach
Consider not administering bolus if there is active bleeding or a high risk of bleeding  >1year: 20 IU/kg/h  aPTTa 60−85s (ratio 1.5−2.5) 
          <50”  <1.2  <0.1  bolus 50 U/kg, ↑ infusion 10% 
          50–59”  1.2−1.4  0.1−0.34  ↑ infusion 10% 
          60–85”  1.5−2.5  0.35−0.7  no change 
          86–95”  2.6−3.0  0.71−0.89  ↓ infusion 10% 
          96–120”  3.1−3.5  0.9−1.2  stop infusion 30min and ↓ 10% 
          >120”  >3.5  >1.2  stop infusion 60min and ↓ 10% 
LMWH          Anti-Xa  Approach  Next control   
EnoxaparinPreterm: 2mg/kg/12h SC  Anti-Xa 0.5−1Initial treatment in noncritical patients; inability to achieve or poor control of INR with VKAs; drug interactions or cancer<0.35Increase by 25%4h after following dose
Term: 1.7mg/kg/12h SC 
<2 months: 1.5mg/kg/12h SC 
>2 months: 1mg/kg/12h SC 
          0.35−0.5  Increase by 10%  4h after following dose   
          0.5−1  No change  At 24h, 1 week and 1 month   
          1−1.5  ↓ 20%  Before next dose   
          1.6−2  Delay 3h and ↓ 30%  Before next dose and at 4hours   
          >2  Suspend until anti-Xa 0.5 and ↓ 40%  Before next dose and, while >0.5, repeat every 12hours   
/<2 months: 150 U/kg/dose/12h SC  Anti-Xa 0.5−1Similar to enoxaparin
>2 months: 100 U/kg/dose/12h SC 
Tinzaparin<2 months: 275 U/kg/24h SC  Anti-Xa 0.5−1Similar to enoxaparin
2−12 months: 250 U/kg/24h SC 
1−5 years: 240 U/kg/24h SC 
5−10 years: 200 U/kg/24h SC 
10−16 years: 175 U/kg/24h SC 
Bemiparin<2 months: 197 IU/kg/24Anti-Xa 0.5−1Similar to enoxaparin
2−12 months: 163 IU/kg every 24
1−5 years: 150 IU/kg every 24
6−12 years: 126 IU/kg every 24
Fondaparinux  0.1mg/kg/24h SC    Anti-Xa 0.5−1    Similar to enoxaparin, but monitoring is performed 3hours after administration       
AcenocoumarolNeonates  0.2mg/kg/day  INR 2-3 (higher in situations with a high risk of thrombosis)Medium- and long-term oral treatmentAccording to INR:
<1year  0.1mg/kg/day 
1−5 years  0.06mg/kg/day 
6−10 years  0.05mg/kg/day 
  • Avoid abrupt changes in dosage (in general, avoid dose increases/decreases of more than 0.5−1mg per week)

  • Avoid administering vitamin K when INR is high but there are no clinical signs of bleeding (skipping a dose may be sufficient)

11−18 years  0.04mg/kg/day 
Warfarin< 1year  0.34mg/kg/day  INR 2−3 (higher in situations with a high risk of thrombosis)Medium- and long-term oral treatment
1−5 years  0.19mg/kg/day 
6−10 years  0.15mg/kg/day 
11−18 years  0.14mg/kg/day 
IDT  0.75μg/kg/min in continuous infusion  HIT  Dose adjustment to achieve target aPTT 1.5−2.5 times the baseline value
Argatroban  0.2μg/kg/min (in the case of liver involvement)  Poor control with UFH 
Bivalirudin0.125mg/kg IV over 1 h0.125−0.25mg/kg/h IVHIT  Dose adjustment to achieve target aPTT 1.5−2.5 times the baseline value
Poor control with UFH 
Systemic thrombolysisrtPA; low-dose protocol:Duration 6−12hoursSee Table 4Management in the intensive care unit. 
Laboratory tests: complete blood count, aPTT, PT, fibrinogen, d-dimer every 6−12hours. 
Maintain fibrinogen > 1g/L and platelets > 50×109/L 
Imaging every 6−12hours (to assess response). 
  • Newborns: rule out intracranial hemorrhage every 24hours.

 
  • Infants < 6 months: consider fresh plasma transfusion (to compensate for a physiological plasminogen deficiency).

 
Concomitant infusion of low-dose UFH (10 IU/kg/h) monitored with anti-Xa (target 0.1−0.3) 
  • Child: 0.03−0.1mg/kg/h (maximum 2mg/h)

  • Newborn: 0.06−0.1mg/kg/h

Hemorrhagic complications: 
  • In the case of mild bleeding at the puncture site, apply pressure and use local hemostatic agents.

  • In cases of more severe bleeding, discontinue treatment and administer fresh frozen plasma, with or without antifibrinolytics.

  • If administered concomitantly with UFH, reverse with protamine sulfate

 
  rtPA, high-dose protocol: 0.5−0.6mg/kg/h  Duration 6 hours             
Local thrombolysis  rtPA: 0.01−0.03mg/kg/h (maximum 2mg/h)  Duration 72−96 hours             
DOACs  Depends on age and weight (see Tables 1 and 2 in the Supplemental material)Monitoring not requiredMedium- and long-term oral treatmentMonitoring may be considered in special situations, such as suspected malabsorption, assessment of levels in patients with clinical bleeding, or when urgent surgery is required.
Rivaroxaban 
Dabigatran 

Abbreviations: DOAC, direct-acting oral anticoagulant; DTI, direct thrombin inhibitor; INR, international normalized ratio; IV, intravenous; LMWH, low-molecular-weight heparin; SC, subcutaneous; UFH, unfractionated heparin; VKA, vitamin K antagonist.

a

The aPTT value in seconds must be adjusted according to the reagent used at each center.

Pharmacological treatments (anticoagulants and fibrinolytics)Unfractionated heparin (UFH)

It has a very short half-life. It is the drug of choice when rapid reversal may be needed: patients admitted to intensive care units, patients recovering from major surgery, patients at high risk of bleeding, patients with kidney failure, etc.5,11

The dose depends on the age of the patient, and it requires close drug monitoring.5,11–13 In infants, its use should be individualized, as the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) does not always correlate to the anti-Xa level.

Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH)

The LMWHs are the drugs of choice for initial treatment of VTE in noncritical pediatric patients.11 There are specific dosage recommendations for the pediatric population. Its efficacy is comparable to that of UFH, with low percentages of recurrence and clinically significant bleeding (<2%). Some of their advantages are that they can be administered subcutaneously, have predictable pharmacokinetics, and carry a lower risk of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT).11,12,14

Fondaparinux. Approved by the FDA for children aged more than 1year and weighing more than 10kg. Its efficacy and safety are comparable to those in adults, but caution is recommended in infants.11,12 Therapeutic levels can be achieved quickly with minimal adjustments, and the reported frequency of clot resolution exceeds 80%. It is indicated in the case of suspected HIT.

Parenteral direct thrombin inhibitors

Bivalirudin and argatroban are possible alternatives for UFH (for example, in the case of suspected or confirmed HIT).11,15

Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs)

For years, VKAs were the mainstay of oral anticoagulation. Currently, their use is limited to patients with advanced kidney failure, significant liver disease, or antiphospholipid syndrome, or when no other alternatives are available. They also require close monitoring.6 When using VKAs in children, it is important to consider physiological vitamin K deficiency beyond the neonatal period, as well as their interactions with food and other medication. Acenocoumarol is the most widely used VKA in Europe. Warfarin is useful in infants and in patients that experience significant fluctuations of the international normalized ratio (INR) while on acenocoumarol.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)

Rivaroxaban and dabigatran have been found to be as effective as conventional therapy, with a low incidence of major bleeding and clinically significant bleeding.16,17 They are approved for the treatment of VTE from birth through age 18 years. The current evidence supports their use in any type of VTE; however, following the initial diagnosis, the administration of parenteral anticoagulation for at least five days is recommended before initiating a DOAC. The dose depends on age and weight (Appendix B, Supplemental material Tables 1 and 2), and they do not require routine drug monitoring.6,18 There is specific information on the use of rivaroxaban in pediatric patients with CVST,19 CVC-related VTE,20 and cancer.21

Direct oral anticoagulants must be taken with food. Dabigatran capsules must not be opened, so caution is advised in patients with dysphagia. It also cannot be administered via a transpyloric tube.

Contraindications and precautions

The contraindications for anticoagulants in pediatric patients are similar to those for adults and can be consulted in the summaries of product characteristics.11,12

  • A basic coagulation panel, complete blood count, and kidney and liver function tests are recommended before starting treatment.

  • UFH and LMWHs: contraindicated in patients with HIT or history of HIT.

  • LMWHs: requires dose adjustment in patients with kidney failure.

  • VKAs: contraindicated in the case of severe liver disease, drug interactions that keep the INR from remaining within the target range, pregnancy, or inability to monitor treatment.

  • DOACs: avoid in the case of moderate-to-severe liver disease, severe renal impairment, concomitant treatment with potent CYP3A4 and/or P-glycoprotein inhibitors or inducers, pregnancy, breastfeeding, and antiphospholipid syndrome.18

Adverse effects

  • All anticoagulants carry a risk of bleeding, but it is rare (<1%).13,16,17

  • HIT is infrequent with UFH (<1%–2% of exposed patients). It is even less frequent with LMWHs. It is associated with a high mortality (20%–30%).

  • There is evidence of an association between prolonged treatment with UFH or LMWHs and osteopenia and osteoporosis.

  • VKAs can, in rare cases, cause skin necrosis, especially when administered to patients with protein C or protein S deficiency.

  • Non-bleeding adverse effects of DOACs: vomiting and transient elevation of transaminases. Dabigatran is associated with dyspepsia and alopecia.

Thrombolytic therapy. Its use is reserved for exceptional situations such as life-threatening massive thrombosis, pulmonary embolism (PE) with hemodynamic instability, or cerebral venous thrombosis with neurologic impairment (Table 4).6 There are different dosing regimens (Table 3). The main complication of thrombolysis is bleeding (10%–20% of cases), which is associated with the duration of treatment and high doses.

Table 4.

Indications and absolute and relative contraindications for thrombolysis in the pediatric population.

Strong indications for thrombolysis  Possible indications 
Only in thrombosis lasting < 14 days  Occlusive, symptomatic iliofemoral or inferior vena cava DVT
Extensive venous thrombosis with total occlusion of venous flow, increased compartment pressures and compromise of arterial blood flow. 
Hemodynamically significant pulmonary embolism (with hypotension or shock; or resulting in right heart strain or necrosis). 
Superior vena cava syndrome. 
Bilateral renal vein thrombosis.  Catheter-related thrombosis in central veins in CVC-dependent patients
Congenital heart disease with shunt thrombosis. 
Consider in large (>2cm) pediculated and mobile right atrial thrombus. 
Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis with neurologic impairment and no improvement with anticoagulation or progressive thrombosis. 
Absolute contraindications  Relative contraindications 
History of hemorrhagic stroke or stroke of unknown etiologyTransient ischemic attack in the past six months 
Treatment with oral anticoagulants 
Ischemic stroke in the past six monthsCurrently pregnant or first week postpartum 
Traumatic resuscitation 
Central nervous system tumorRefractory hypertension 
Advanced liver disease 
Recent head trauma or major surgery within the previous 3 weeksInfectious endocarditis 
Additional Contraindications 
Bleeding diathesisSevere asphyxia in the past 7 days 
Gastrointestinal hemorrhage in the past 2 months 
Active bleedingIntracranial neoplasm, arteriovenous malformation, or aneurysm 
Uncorrected hemorrhage 
Specific contraindications related to catheterization, including (but not limited to) a significant aneurysm or intimal injury in a systemic artery (aorta, femoral artery) 
Nonpharmacological treatment

Anticoagulation is the first-line treatment, but in the event of an absolute contraindication or treatment failure, there are alternatives whose use must be determined on a case-by-case basis by an experienced multidisciplinary care team.

Inferior vena cava filter

Its use should be temporary, and there must be a clear plan for its retrieval once the contraindication to anticoagulation no longer exists. There are technical limitations: in patients weighing < 10kg, it cannot be placed due to the diameter of the vena cava. In addition, there is a risk of increased clotting, thrombosis within the filter, filter migration, and vein perforation.22

Thrombectomy. There are two modalities: open (surgical) and minimally invasive (catheter-assisted). The former is reserved for PE with hemodynamic compromise (see “pulmonary thromboembolism”), especially if systemic thrombolysis has failed or is contraindicated. Favorable outcomes have been reported in single cases and small case series, but it is associated with significant risks.4,6

Peculiarities of the management of VTE in pediatric patientsDecision to treat and selection of anticoagulant therapy

The decision to treat should take into account the clinical condition of the patient, the potential benefits (pain control, prevention of clinical extension or recurrence, and reduction of the risk of post-thrombotic syndrome [PTS]), and the risk of bleeding.

The key factors are the location of the VTE and the clinical manifestations.23 In patients with symptomatic VTE, initiating anticoagulation is recommended, especially in cases of proximal DVT, PE, occlusive thrombosis, or persistent risk factors (CVC, cancer, infection, etc).4 In contrast, for cases of clinically unsuspected thrombosis, the current evidence suggests a low risk of progression; therefore, the decision to initiate treatment should be individualized, taking into account the location (higher risk of persistence in femoral thrombosis), comorbidities, the need to maintain the CVC in cases of CVC-related VTE, and the importance of preserving the venous capital for future vascular access or for previous clots.24 If treatment is not initiated, the patient should be closely monitored, especially if a recent VTE is suspected (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

General management of pediatric venous thromboembolism (VTE) and recommendations regarding treatment duration.

Abbreviations: APS, antiphospholipid syndrome; CVC, central venous catheter; DOAC, direct-acting oral anticoagulant; LMWH, low-molecular-weight heparin; PE, pulmonary thromboembolism; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; UFH, unfractionated heparin; VKA, vitamin K antagonist.

The use of thrombectomy and thrombolysis (Table 4)25 is infrequent in pediatrics and their indication must be agreed on by a multidisciplinary care team.4,6

Duration of treatment

The duration of treatment depends on the presence of a known trigger, the risk of recurrence, the resolution of the thrombosis, as well as other factors such as the characteristics of the patient and the thrombosis (Fig. 1).4,26,27 Indefinite treatment is not recommended in pediatric patients due to its impact on quality of life and the lack of evidence in support of it.4,6

Catheter-related VTE

The presence of a CVC is the main risk factor for VTE in the pediatric population.28 The decision to initiate treatment is based on the etiology and the presence of symptoms (Fig. 1). The decision not to treat can be considered in cases of unsuspected (asymptomatic) CVC-related VTE.4,6

With regard to the CVC, the management depends on whether it is a functioning CVC and the treatment needs to continue (Fig. 2). To reduce the risk of embolic phenomena, it is recommended to delay removal until at least 48hours of anticoagulation have been delivered, especially in patients with extensive thrombosis or with right-to-left shunts.6,28

Figure 2.

Management of central venous catheter-associated thrombosis, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism.

Abbreviations: BNP, B-type natriuretic peptide; CVC, central venous catheter; DVT, deep vein thrombosis; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; PE, pulmonary embolism; RV, right ventricle; UFH, unfractionated heparin.

A watchful waiting approach is recommended for CVC-associated superficial venous thrombosis of the upper extremities.4 However, anticoagulation should be considered in cases of symptomatic thrombosis associated with a peripherally inserted central catheter.

Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis

Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis is a rare and heterogeneous condition (1.1 per 100 000 children per year) that is associated with permanent neurological sequelae in up to 35% of cases. Head and neck infections (mastoiditis or sinusitis) are the most frequent cause, but it has also been reported in the context of cancer (related to chemotherapy), autoimmune and inflammatory diseases, and congenital or acquired prothrombotic conditions. Its clinical presentation varies, ranging from mild headache to seizures, altered level of consciousness, focal neurologic deficits, or signs of intracranial hypertension.29

International guidelines recommend the use of anticoagulation in pediatric patients with CVST with or without associated bleeding (secondary to a complication of CVST, not due to other causes), but there are situations in which anticoagulation must be individualized due to a high risk of bleeding: newborn infant, CVST associated with infection (requiring surgery), trauma, a history of neurosurgery, or cancer.4,6,29

Thrombolysis is not recommended in pediatric patients. It may be considered in the case of an ischemic event or if there is neurologic deterioration despite anticoagulation. Mechanical thrombectomy may be considered depending on the experience and resources of the facility.4,6

Pulmonary embolism

Although underreported, PE is rare in the pediatric population (5.1–9.2 per 10 000 intensive care unit admissions). Its significance lies in the associated mortality (9%–10%) and the high recurrence rate (up to 12.5%).3,6

Pulmonary embolism can result from a circulating clot or from in situ pulmonary artery thrombosis secondary to local causes, such as congenital heart disease. In addition to the previously described risk factors (Table 1), there are peculiarities in adolescents: a higher incidence of unprovoked PE and greater prevalence of hereditary thrombophilia, as well as other risk factors such as obesity, hormonal contraception, autoinflammatory diseases, or anatomical predisposition (see “thrombosis secondary to anatomical abnormalities”).30

The diagnosis is not always straightforward, either because the patient reports nonspecific symptoms (shortness of breath, anxiety, pleurisy, or cough), or because, despite the presence of florid symptoms, PE is not included in the differential diagnosis due to its rarity. Acute and severe forms are characterized by varying degrees of pulmonary artery obstruction, pulmonary hypertension, and acute right-sided heart failure or dysfunction, which may progress to left-sided heart failure, obstructive shock, and cardiac arrest. Less severe forms present with mild, often self-limiting signs and symptoms that may be attributed to another condition.30

Early initiation of treatment is associated with a reduced mortality. The therapeutic approach depends on the patient’s hemodynamic status and the presence of cardiac dysfunction; therefore, performing an urgent echocardiogram and laboratory tests (including troponin) is essential. Although anticoagulation is the first-line treatment in the vast majority of cases, decisions regarding thrombolysis and thrombectomy in specific situations should be made jointly by a multidisciplinary care team (Fig. 2).4,6,30

Intracardiac thrombosis

Intracardiac thrombosis is rare in children, but it is associated with increased morbidity and mortality (10%–15%, although this is related to the presence of an underlying condition). It is associated with the use of CVCs, congenital or acquired heart disease, dilated cardiomyopathy, hypercoagulable states, and cancer.31

Transthoracic echocardiography is the imaging modality of choice for initial diagnosis. Transesophageal echocardiography offers a greater sensitivity (for example, in congenital heart disease). In complex cases or when visualization is inadequate, CT angiography may be useful (Fig. 3).32

Figure 3.

Management of intracardiac thrombosis, portal thrombosis and thrombosis secondary to anatomical abnormalities.

Abbreviations: CHD, congenital heart disease; CVC, central venous catheter; DVT, deep vein thrombosis.

The decision whether to treat or not to treat depends on the risk of thrombosis or bleeding.4 Anticoagulation is recommended as the treatment of choice in patients at high risk of thrombosis: a thrombus ≥ 2cm in size or occupying a large portion of the atrium, mobile or pedunculated, associated with a functioning CVC that cannot be removed or with evidence of progression in a patient with low bleeding risk (Fig. 3).4–6,32 Thrombolysis or thrombectomy should be reserved for exceptional situations (life-threatening hemodynamic instability) at experienced facilities.4,6

Portal vein thrombosis

Portal vein thrombosis is a rare event. In pediatrics, it is usually associated with abdominal surgery (liver transplantation, splenectomy), sepsis, and prothrombotic conditions (such as thrombophilia or sickle cell disease).33 Its management depends on the extent and impact of the thrombosis. Anticoagulation is not generally recommended, and it is reserved for obstructive thrombosis, post-liver transplant thrombosis, or idiopathic thrombosis (Fig. 3).4 Spontaneous resolution without treatment has been reported in 30% to 70% of cases, but complications such as hepatic lobe atrophy, portal hypertension, cavernomatous transformation of the portal vein, and esophageal varices have also been reported.33

Splenic and mesenteric vein thrombosis

Splenic and mesenteric vein thrombosis are extremely rare conditions. They are associated with pancreatitis, surgery, trauma, and the use of oral contraceptives.34 Anticoagulation is associated with a recanalization rate of 55% (compared to 29% without treatment), a low incidence of bleeding (3.8%), and a reduced mortality.35 There is insufficient evidence to support thrombolysis.34

Thrombosis secondary to anatomical abnormalities

Thoracic outlet syndrome is caused by the compression of the left subclavian vein at the level of the costoclavicular passage. In adolescents, it is associated with sporting activities (swimming, volleyball) due to hypertrophy of the scalene or subclavian muscles, but it may also result from the presence of a cervical rib or other causes. The management focuses on recanalizing the vessel and reducing the size of the thrombus, definitive treatment with surgical decompression, preventing recurrence and PE, and facilitating resumption of athletic activity (Fig. 3).36 Acute phase (0–14 days): consider catheter-directed thrombolysis or mechanical thrombectomy. Subacute or chronic phase (>14 days): consider staged endovascular recanalization and planning for surgical decompression (resection of the first rib and/or scalene resection or venolysis).37 There is a high risk of rethrombosis if the anatomical cause is not resolved.

May-Thurner syndrome is an anatomical variant that results in the compression of the left iliac vein against the lumbar spine by the overlying right iliac artery. Anticoagulation is indicated in the presence of associated thrombosis, but will not resolve the venous occlusion secondary to the anatomical abnormality (Fig. 3).38 Thrombolysis or thrombectomy should be considered in cases with acute iliofemoral VTE and significant limb compromise (severe pain/swelling, risk of loss of function or phlegmasia) to reduce the risk of PTS. Endovascular revascularization (angioplasty with/without stent placement) may be indicated in the presence of significant compression and persistent symptoms or recurrent thrombosis despite anticoagulation.38

Post-thrombotic syndrome

Post-thrombotic syndrome is a chronic complication that can develop following a VTE. It affects mobility and limits physical activity and activities of daily living, with an impact on quality of life. The symptoms vary according to the affected territory: in the extremities, pain, swelling, skin changes, ulceration, pruritus, paresthesia, nighttime cramps, venous claudication; in PE, chronic dyspnea, limitation of aerobic activities, impaired pulmonary or heart function, chronic pulmonary hypertension; in portal vein thrombosis, portal hypertension and gastroesophageal varices.9,39 Its etiology is multifactorial (Appendix B, Supplemental material, Fig. 1)39 and its frequency varies from series to series (26% in a systematic review, higher in prospective studies). Individualized follow-up is recommended for high-risk patients (unresolved VTE, cancer, portal vein thrombosis).4,39

The diagnosis is based on the evaluation of signs and symptoms (Table 5).9,39,40 The usefulness of various therapeutic strategies, such as the use of elastic compression stocking with moderate pressure, physical therapy, and supervised exercise, is still under debate.40

Table 5.

Components of standardized outcome measures for post-thrombotic syndrome: modified Villalta scale and Manco-Johnson instrument.

Modified Villalta scaleManco-Johnson instrument
Components  Scoring  Components  Scoring 
Symptomsa  Signs:   
Pain or abnormal use  1 point (if present)  Edema  1 point (if present) 
Swelling  1 point (if present)  Dilated superficial collateral veins  1 point (if present) 
    Venous stasis dermatitis  1 point (if present) 
    Venous stasis ulcers  1 point (if present) 
Signs:    Symptoms:   
Hyperpigmentation  1 point (if present)  Chronic lower-extremity pain   
Increased limb circumferenceb  1 point (if present)  Limiting aerobic activities  1 point (if present) 
Pitting edema  1 point (if present)  Limiting activities of daily living  1 point (if present) 
Venous collaterals on skin  1 point (if present)  At rest  1 point (if present) 
Pigmentation of skin  1 point (if present)     
Tenderness on palpation  1 point (if present)     
Head swelling  1 (moderate) or 2 (severe)     
Varicosities  1 (moderate) or 2 (severe)     
Venous ulcer  9 points (if present)     
Classification of PTS:    Classification of PTS:   
Absent PTS  0 points  Absent PTS  0 points 
Mild PTS  1−3 points  PTS of some degree present  ≥ 1 points 
Moderate PTS  4−8 points  Physically and functionally significant PTS  ≥ 1 sign and ≥ 1 symptom 
Severe PTS  ≥ 8 points     

CAPTSure tool: assesses physical signs and symptoms reported by patients and caregivers with high reliability; culturally adapted versions are available.

PODCI: assesses the functional impact of PTS on the daily life of the child.

a

Reported by patient, parent, caregiver, or proxy.

b

>3% compared to contralateral side.

Discussion

Although its incidence is increasing, VTE continues to be relatively rare in the pediatric population, and it encompasses multiple conditions that are managed with different diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Several international guidelines agree that the main limitation in the management of pediatric VTE is the scarcity and low quality of the available evidence.4–6 Therefore, they conclude that the management of pediatric VTE should be led by experienced pediatric hematology specialists or by a multidisciplinary care team under the supervision of an expert in the field.5

This document synthesizes the best available evidence and provides concise information with the aim of facilitating decision-making in the management of VTE in pediatric patients, in order to improve their prognosis and reduce medium- and long-term complications.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

The three lead authors (RB, MF, and PRA) conceived, coordinated and reviewed the study, integrating and harmonizing all the information provided by the contributors (HCP, FC, MGdC, LG, SI, BA, RL, SOV, GPP).

Declaration of Generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process

No generative AIs or AI-assisted technologies were used in the development of the study, the analysis of the data or the writing of the manuscript.

Funding

This research project did not receive specific financial support from funding agencies in the public, private or not-for-profit sectors.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare having no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A
Supplementary data

The following is Supplementary data to this article:

Icono mmc1.pdf

References
[1]
S.H. O’Brien, J.R. Stanek, C.M. Witmer, L. Raffini.
The continued rise of venous thromboembolism across US Children’s Hospitals.
[2]
P. Davenport, M. Sola-Visner.
Hemostatic challenges in neonates.
[3]
J. Jaffray, A. Mahajerin, G. Young, N. Goldenberg, L. Ji, R. Sposto, et al.
A multi-institutional registry of pediatric hospital-acquired thrombosis cases: the Children’s Hospital-Acquired Thrombosis (CHAT) project.
Thromb Res, 161 (2018), pp. 67-72
[4]
P. Monagle, M. Azzam, R. Bercovitz, M. Betensky, R. Bhat, T. Biss, et al.
American Society of Hematology/International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2024 updated guidelines for treatment of venous thromboembolism in pediatric patients.
Blood Adv, 9 (2025), pp. 2587-2636
[5]
P. Monagle, A.K.C. Chan, N.A. Goldenberg, R.N. Ichord, J.M. Journeycake, U. Nowak-Göttl, et al.
Antithrombotic therapy in neonates and children: Antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American college of chest physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.
Chest, 141 (2012), pp. e737S-e801S
[6]
P. Monagle, C.A. Cuello, C. Augustine, M. Bonduel, L.R. Brandão, T. Capman, et al.
American Society of Hematology 2018 Guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: treatment of pediatric venous thromboembolism.
Blood Adv, 2 (2018), pp. 3292-3316
[7]
F.J. Climent, H.J. Campo Palacio, M. Falcón, M. Gutiérrez Alvarino, R. López-Almaraz, R. Berrueco.
Enfermedad tromboembólica en pediatría: abordaje de situaciones clínicas especiales.
An Pediatr (Engl Ed), 105 (2026),
[8]
H. Whitworth, E.K. Amankwah, M. Betensky, L.A. Castellucci, A. Cuker, N.A. Goldenberg, et al.
Updated guidance for efficacy and safety outcomes for clinical trials in venous thromboembolism in children: communication from the ISTH SSC Subcommittee on Pediatric and Neonatal Thrombosis and Hemostasis.
J Thromb Haemost, 21 (2023), pp. 1666-1673
[9]
M. Betensky, K. Kulkarni, M. Rizzi, S. Jones, L.R. Brandão, E.V.S. Faustino, et al.
Recommendations for standardized definitions, clinical assessment, and future research in pediatric clinically unsuspected venous thromboembolism: communication from the ISTH SSC subcommittee on pediatric and neonatal thrombosis and hemostasis.
J Thromb Haemost, 20 (2022), pp. 1729-1734
[10]
C. Kearon, W. Ageno, S.C. Cannegieter, B. Cosmi, G.J. Geersing, P.A. Kyrle.
Categorization of patients as having provoked or unprovoked venous thromboembolism: guidance from the SSC of ISTH.
J Thromb Haemost, 14 (2016), pp. 1480-1483
[11]
G. Young.
Anticoagulants in children and adolescents.
Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Program, 2015 (2015), pp. 111-116
[12]
C. Witmer, L. Raffini.
Treatment of venous thromboembolism in pediatric patients.
Blood, 135 (2020), pp. 335-343
[13]
P. Monagle, F. Newall.
Management of thrombosis in children and neonates: practical use of anticoagulants in children.
Hematology, 2018 (2018), pp. 399-404
[14]
I.L.M. Klaassen, J.J. Sol, M.H. Suijker, K. Fijnvandraat, M.D. van de Wetering, C. Heleen van Ommen.
Are low-molecular-weight heparins safe and effective in children? A systematic review.
Blood Rev, 33 (2019), pp. 33-42
[15]
J. Jaffray, G. Young.
Direct oral anticoagulants for use in paediatrics.
Lancet Child Adolesc Health, 6 (2022), pp. 207-214
[16]
C. Male, A.W.A. Lensing, J.S. Palumbo, R. Kumar, I. Nurmeev, K. Hege, et al.
Rivaroxaban compared with standard anticoagulants for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in children: a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.
Lancet Haematol, (2019), pp. 18-27
[17]
J. Halton, L.R. Brandão, M. Luciani, L. Bomgaars, E. Chalmers, L.G. Mitchell, et al.
Dabigatran etexilate for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in children (DIVERSITY): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 2b/3, non-inferiority trial.
Lancet Haematol, 8 (2021), pp. e22-e33
[18]
T.T. Biss, E.A. Chalmers.
Addendum to British Society for Haematology guideline on the investigation, management and prevention of venous thrombosis in children (Br. J. Haematol. 2011; 154: 196-207).
Br J Haematol, 194 (2021), pp. 996-998
[19]
P. Connor, M. Sánchez van Kammen, A.W.A. Lensing, E. Chalmers, K. Kállay, K. Hege, et al.
Safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban in pediatric cerebral venous thrombosis (EINSTEIN-Jr CVT).
Blood Adv, 4 (2020), pp. 6250-6258
[20]
K. Thom, A.W.A. Lensing, I. Nurmeev, F. Bajolle, D. Bonnet, G. Kenet, et al.
Safety and efficacy of anticoagulant therapy in pediatric catheter-related venous thrombosis (EINSTEIN-Jr CVC-VTE).
Blood Adv, 4 (2020), pp. 4632-4639
[21]
J.S. Palumbo, A.W.A. Lensing, L.R. Brandão, H.L. Hooimeijer, G. Kenet, H. van Ommen, et al.
Anticoagulation in pediatric cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: a subgroup analysis of EINSTEIN-Jr.
Blood Adv, 6 (2022), pp. 5821-5828
[22]
A.K. Guzman, M. Zahra, S.O. Trerotola, L.J. Raffini, M. Itkin, M.S. Keller, et al.
IVC filter retrieval in adolescents: experience in a tertiary pediatric center.
Pediatr Radiol, 46 (2016), pp. 534-540
[23]
S. Jones, P. Monagle, F. Newall.
Do asymptomatic clots in children matter?.
Thromb Res, 189 (2020), pp. 24-34
[24]
S. Jones, W. Butt, P. Monagle, T. Cain, F. Newall.
The natural history of asymptomatic central venous catheter-related thrombosis in critically ill children.
[25]
C. Tarango, M.J. Manco-Johnson.
Pediatric thrombolysis: a practical approach.
Front Pediatr, 5 (2017), pp. 1-7
[26]
R.R. Johnson, E.V.S. Faustino.
Central venous catheter-associated deep vein thrombosis in critically ill pediatric patients: risk factors, prevention, and treatment.
Curr Opin Pediatr, 34 (2022), pp. 273-278
[27]
N.A. Goldenberg, J.M. Kittelson, T.C. Abshire, M. Bonaca, J.F. Casella, R.A. Dale, et al.
Effect of anticoagulant therapy for 6 weeks vs 3 months on recurrence and bleeding events in patients younger than 21 years of age with provoked venous thromboembolism: the kids-DOTT randomized clinical trial.
JAMA, 327 (2022), pp. 129-137
[28]
J. Jaffray, M. Bauman, P. Massicotte.
The impact of central venous catheters on pediatric venous thromboembolism.
Front Pediatr, 5 (2017), pp. 5
[29]
G. Sébire, B. Tabarki, D.E. Saunders, I. Leroy, R. Liesner, C. Saint-Martin, et al.
Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in children: risk factors, presentation, diagnosis and outcome.
Brain, 128 (2005), pp. 477-489
[30]
C. Ross, R. Kumar, M.C. Pelland-Marcotte, S. Mehta, M.E. Kleinman, R.R. Thiagarajan, et al.
Acute management of high-risk and intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism in children: a review.
[31]
T. Farbstein-Aljanati, T. Tirosh-Wagner, I. Budnik, U. Katz, S. Borik, A.A. Barg, et al.
Intracardiac thrombi in children: a decade of experience at a tertiary care hospital.
Pediatr Hematol Oncol, 42 (2025), pp. 323-332
[32]
S. Agarwal, E. Abdelghani, J.R. Stanek, A. Sankar, C.L. Cua, B.A. Kerlin, et al.
Intracardiac thrombi in pediatrics: anticoagulation approach and treatment outcomes.
Res Pract Thromb Haemost, 7 (2023),
[33]
I. Yankov, R. Shentova-Eneva, H. Mumdzhiev, P. Petleshkova, M. Krasteva, D. Chatalbashev, et al.
Extrahepatic portal vein thrombosis in childhood: risk factors, clinical manifestations, and management.
Med Princ Pract, 31 (2022), pp. 524-531
[34]
A. Boccatonda, S. Gentilini, E. Zanata, C. Simion, C. Serra, P. Simioni, et al.
Portal vein thrombosis: state-of-the-art review.
[35]
O. Cohen, O. Efros, N. Riva, W. Ageno, S. Soffer, E. Klang, et al.
Anticoagulant treatment for pediatric splanchnic vein thrombosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Thromb Haemost, 21 (2023), pp. 2499-2508
[36]
A. Price, N. Fredricks, N. Truong, R.Y. North.
Pediatric thoracic outlet syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Neurosurg Pediatr, 33 (2024), pp. 484-495
[37]
J.M. Matos, L. Gonzalez, E. Kfoury, A. Echeverria, C.F. Bechara, P.H. Lin.
Outcomes following operative management of thoracic outlet syndrome in the pediatric patients.
Vascular, 26 (2018), pp. 410-417
[38]
L. Avila, N. Cullinan, M. White, M. Gaballah, A.M. Cahill, D. Warad, et al.
Pediatric May-Thurner Syndrome-Systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.
J Thromb Haemost, 19 (2021), pp. 1283-1293
[39]
N.A. Goldenberg, M.P. Donadini, S.R. Kahn, M. Crowther, G. Kenet, U. Nowak-Göttl, et al.
Post-thrombotic syndrome in children: a systematic review of frequency of occurrence, validity of outcome measures, and prognostic factors.
Haematologica, 95 (2010), pp. 1952-1959
[40]
M. Betensky, N.A. Goldenberg.
Post-thrombotic syndrome in children.
Thromb Res, 164 (2018), pp. 129-135
Copyright © 2026. Asociación Española de Pediatría
Download PDF
Idiomas
Anales de Pediatría (English Edition)
Article options
Tools
Supplemental materials