Suggestions
Idioma
Journal Information
Vol. 105. Issue 3.
(1 September 2026)
Cite
Cite
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 105. Issue 3.
(1 September 2026)
Letter to the Editor
Full text access

Selection bias: concerning “Impact of digital media on development and physical health.” Authors reply

Sesgos de selección de la evidencia, a propósito de «Efectos de los medios digitales en la salud física y el desarrollo». Respuesta de los autores
Visits
389
María Angustias Salmerón-Ruiza,
Corresponding author
mariasalmeronruiz@gmail.com

Corresponding author.
, Cristina García de Riberab, Valero Sebastián Barberánc, Lefa Eddy-Ivesd, Julio Alvarez-Pittie, en representación del Comité de Promoción de la Salud Asociación Española de Pediatría Madrid España
a Hospital Ruber Internacional, Madrid, Spain
b Centro de Salud Magdalena, Valladolid, Spain
c Centro de Salud Salvador Allende, Valencia. Spain
d Servicio de Psiquiatría Hospital HM Nens, Barcelona. Spain
e Servicio de Pediatría, Consorcio Hospital General, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, CIBER Fisiopatología Obesidad y Nutrición, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
This item has received
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Tables (1)
Table 1. Rationale of recommendations.
Tables
Full Text
Dear Editor:

We thank Xavier Bosch-Capblanch1 for his interest in our work and for providing the opportunity to qualify certain aspects of our review,2 aimed at the updating of the Family Digital Plan (FDP).3 Regarding the use of devices during childhood, it should be noted that the potential benefits of educational games are limited to controlled experimental settings, such as the one described in the article by the Canadian Paediatric Society, which the author interprets out of the general context.4 In the real-world setting, screen use among children under 5 is typically passive, displacing physical play and interactions that are essential for neurodevelopment.

Guided by the precautionary principle5 in the face of documented risks, we agree with positions such as the one by the Karolinska Institutet,6 which highlights the lack of evidence of clear benefits of the digitalization of education in the school system compared to the use of conventional tools of proven effectiveness. We uphold our opinion that the critical factor is the total screen time, which displaces healthy habits, and consider that addressing each type of device separately would lessen the effectiveness of prevention strategies. We would also like to comment on the mentioned “paradox” regarding digital skill acquisition: early exposure to digital devices does not guarantee acquisition of digital skills and can hinder development, as higher cognitive functions develop from a foundation built on human interactions and symbolic play. The global guidelines of the FDP (Table 1) aim to offer integral protection from the public health system and are founded on the proactive education of families and the preventive role of pediatricians in mitigating the negative impact of the displacement effect in the absence of demonstrated benefits.

Table 1.

Rationale of recommendations.

Diet  A clinical approach that ignores nutrition is incomplete  Screen use during meals, increased risk of consuming high-calorie foods. 
Digital skills “paradox”  Early exposure to screens does not guarantee digital literacy and can hinder neurodevelopment  The development of high-level digital skills requires a preexisting cognitive architecture that develops through symbolic play, analog (paper/print) reading and writing, and human interaction. 
Role of pediatricians and families  The pediatrician and the family are key components of prevention  Pediatricians need to receive formal training on digital health to deliver health education. Proactive education of parents based on the current evidence is a key measure to protect children 
Ethical considerations

This work did not involve participation of any patients or human subjects.

Funding

This research did not receive any external funding.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References
[1]
Bosch-Capblanch X. Sesgos de selección de la evidencia, a propósito de «Efectos de los medios digitales en la salud física y el desarrollo». An Pediatr (Barc). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anpedi.2026.504197.
[2]
M.A. Salmerón-Ruiz, C. García de Ribera, V.S. Barberán, L.E. Ives, J. Álvarez-Pitti.
Efectos de los medios digitales en la salud física y el desarrollo.
An Pediatr (Barc)., 102 (2025),
[3]
Asociación Española de Pediatría. Plan Digital Familiar [Internet]. Madrid: AEP; 2023-2025 [consultado 16 Jul 2026]. Available from: https://plandigitalfamiliar.aeped.es/plandigitalfamiliar.php.
[4]
Canadian Paediatric Society, Digital Health Task Force, Ottawa, Ontario.
Screen time and young children: Promoting health and development in a digital world.
Paediatr Child Health [Internet], 22 (2017), pp. 461-477
[5]
M.A. Salmerón-Ruiz, I. Montiel, C. L’Ecuyer.
Llamada a la prudencia en el uso de las pantallas: ausencia de evidencia no es evidencia de ausencia.
An Pediatr (Barc)., 101 (2024), pp. 73-74
[6]
Karolinska Institutet. Opinion on the Swedish National Agency for Education’s proposal for a national digitalisation strategy for the school system 2023-2027. Estocolmo: Karolinska Institutet; 28 abr 2023. Informe n.º: 1-322/2023.
Copyright © 2026. Asociación Española de Pediatría
Download PDF
Idiomas
Anales de Pediatría (English Edition)
Article options
Tools