Suggestions
Idioma
Journal Information
Cite
Cite
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Visits
351
Original Article
Full text access
Available online 13 July 2026

The impact of very early and early enteral nutrition on intestinal permeability in children with pancreatitis: A randomized controlled study

El impacto de la nutrición enteral muy temprana y temprana sobre la permeabilidad intestinal en niños con pancreatitis: un estudio controlado aleatorizado
Visits
351
Jan Stanisław Bukowskia,
Corresponding author
jan.bukowski@wum.edu.pl

Corresponding author.
, Tatiana Jamerb, Kinga Kowalska-Duplagac, Anna Stelmaszczyk-Emmeld, Marcin Banasiuka, Aleksandra Banaszkiewicza
a Departamento de Gastroenterología y Nutrición Pediátrica, Universidad Médica de Varsovia, Varsovia, Poland
b Segundo Departamento Clínico de Pediatría, Gastroenterología y Nutrición, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Médica de Breslavia, Breslavia, Poland
c Departamento de Pediatría, Gastroenterología y Nutrición, Colegio Médico, Universidad Jagellónica, Cracovia, Poland
d Departamento de Diagnóstico de Laboratorio e Inmunología Clínica Pediátrica, Universidad Médica de Varsovia, Varsovia, Poland
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (2)
fig0005
fig0010
Tables (3)
Table 1. Baseline characteristic of the groups.
Tables
Table 2. Results of laboratory tests in the two groups.
Tables
Table 3. Zonulin concentrations in the two groups.
Tables
Abstract
Introduction and objectives

One of the pathophysiological mechanisms of acute pancreatitis (AP) is the reduced integrity of the intestinal mucosa. Enteral nutrition supports the gut barrier, but its effect on intestinal permeability in pediatric AP has not yet been evaluated. The aim of this study was to assess how very early enteral nutrition (within 24hours of admission) and early enteral nutrition (after the first 24hours) affect plasma zonulin levels in children with mild-to-moderate AP.

Methods

We conducted a prospective randomized study between January 2019 and September 2022 in three university hospitals. It included children aged 1 to 18 years with AP. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: (A) refeeding within 24hours of admission (very early nutrition) or (B) refeeding at least 24hours after admission (early nutrition). Blood samples and clinical data were collected during the first 3 days of the hospital stay.

Results

Zonulin concentrations were measured in 61 children (37 in group A and 24 in group B). The groups did not differ significantly in age, weight, height, body mass index, AP diagnostics, or laboratory results. Zonulin levels were comparable in both groups throughout the first 3 days of hospitalization.

Conclusion

In children with mild pancreatitis, very early enteral nutrition does not appear to affect intestinal barrier permeability, as assessed by plasma zonulin levels, compared to early nutrition.

Keywords:
Pancreatology
Pediatrics
Feeding
Zonulin
Pediatric gastroenterology
Resumen
Introducción y objetivos

Uno de los mecanismos fisiopatológicos de la pancreatitis aguda (PA) es la disminución de la integridad de la mucosa intestinal. La nutrición enteral favorece la barrera intestinal, pero su efecto sobre la permeabilidad intestinal en la PA pediátrica aún no ha sido evaluado. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo analizar cómo la nutrición enteral muy temprana (dentro de las primeras 24 horas tras el ingreso) y la nutrición enteral temprana (después de las primeras 24 horas) influyen en los niveles plasmáticos de zonulina en niños con PA de leve a moderada.

Métodos

Estudio prospectivo y aleatorizado realizado entre enero de 2019 y septiembre de 2022 en tres hospitales universitarios. Incluyó a niños de 1 a 18 años con PA. Los pacientes fueron asignados aleatoriamente a uno de dos grupos: (A) realimentación dentro de las primeras 24 horas de hospitalización (nutrición muy temprana) o (B) realimentación al menos 24 horas después del ingreso (nutrición temprana). Se recogieron muestras de sangre y datos clínicos durante los primeros 3 días de hospitalización.

Resultados

Las concentraciones de zonulina se midieron en 61 niños (37 en el grupo A y 24 en el grupo B). Los grupos no mostraron diferencias significativas en edad, peso, talla, índice de masa corporal, diagnóstico de PA o resultados de laboratorio. Los niveles de zonulina fueron comparables entre ambos grupos a lo largo de los primeros 3 días de hospitalización.

Conclusión

En niños con pancreatitis leve, la nutrición enteral muy temprana no parece influir en la permeabilidad de la barrera intestinal, evaluada mediante los niveles plasmáticos de zonulina, en comparación con la nutrición temprana.

Palabras clave:
Pancreatología
Pediatría
Alimentación
Zonulina
Gastroenterología pediátrica
Graphical abstract
Full Text
Introduction

The incidence of acute pancreatitis (AP) in children has been increasing over the past three decades. Most pediatric cases of AP are mild to moderate. One proposed mechanism of AP involves the reduced integrity of the intestinal mucosa. Intestinal permeability increases early in the course of AP due to splanchnic hypoperfusion and subsequent ischemia-reperfusion injury, which damages the gut mucosa.1,2 This damage may allow bacterial translocation, contributing to systemic inflammation and sepsis.3 Numerous studies have shown increased intestinal permeability in adults with AP,4–10 but its impact in pediatric patients has not yet been evaluated. Although no single noninvasive method assesses intestinal permeability reliably, plasma zonulin is considered a potential marker.11 Studies in adults suggest that early oral feeding may shorten hospital stays and reduce the incidence of infectious complications, morbidity, and mortality.12–17 These findings have influenced pediatric recommendations.18,19

Given that early nutrition may improve intestinal permeability (reflected indirectly by lower plasma zonulin levels) and potentially improve outcomes, we examined the effect of very early enteral nutrition (within 24hours of admission) compared with early nutrition (after the first 24hours) on plasma zonulin concentrations in children with mild-to-moderate AP.

Material and methods

We conducted a prospective randomized study between January 2019 and September 2022 in three university hospitals. It included children aged 1 to 18 years with AP, diagnosed according to standard criteria (meeting at least two of the following: abdominal pain suggestive of pancreatitis; serum amylase and/or lipase levels at least three times the upper limit of normal; characteristic imaging findings) and with no contraindications for enteral nutrition.18 The severity of AP was assessed after 48hours.20 Mild AP was defined as absence of organ failure and local or systemic complications, while moderate AP was defined as transient organ failure, local complications, or exacerbation of comorbidities.20 Patients who developed severe AP were excluded from the analysis. Additional exclusion criteria included severe illness/instability, inflammatory bowel disease, gastrointestinal or respiratory infections, renal or cardiac insufficiency, type 1 diabetes, cystic fibrosis, contraindications to enteral feeding, or lack of informed consent.

Patients were randomized using a computer-generated algorithm in blocks of four into two groups: (A) refeeding within 24hours of admission (very early) and (B) refeeding at least 24hours after admission but within 72hours (early nutrition). Refeeding consisted of a low-fat diet prepared by hospital dieticians and adapted according to the patient’s tolerance. All children received appropriate fluid therapy and pain management as needed.

The primary outcome was intestinal permeability, assessed via plasma zonulin concentrations. Blood samples were collected on the first, second, and third days of hospitalization using EDTA as an anticoagulant. Samples were centrifuged at 2000 g (3575 revolutions per minute) for 10minutes at 4°C and then frozen at −80°C within 2hours of collection. Concurrently, standard biochemical tests were performed in the local laboratories of the participating hospitals, including C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and serum activity of amylase, lipase, and aminotransferases (alanine aminotransferase, asparagine aminotransferase, and gamma-glutamyl transferase). As laboratory methods varied across sites, each CRP result was expressed as a percentage of the upper limit of normal.

We used the IDK Zonulin ELISA kit for the in vitro measurement of zonulin in plasma. Preparation of standards, reagents, and plasma samples, as well as the assay procedure and data acquisition, were carried out according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The method has been shown to be linear from 3.03 to 40.25ng/mL, with nonlinear behavior of less than ±20% within this range for concentrations above the limit of quantitation. The limit of detection was 0.183ng/mL.

The sample size was determined based on previous research showing a difference in length of stay between patients refed with liquid vs nonliquid diets (mean [SD], 6.75 [3.37] vs 4.18 [2.86] days).21 For a statistical power of 80% and a significance level of 5%, we calculated that a minimum of 35 patients were required per group, for a total of 70 patients. Allowing for an estimated 20% rate of non-evaluable cases, the final sample size was set at 84 patients.

The statistical analysis was performed with the software Statistica 13 (StatSoft; Oklahoma, USA). We used the Shapiro-Wilk test to assess the normality of the distribution of quantitative variables. Continuous variables were compared using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test, and proportions with the χ2 test, applying the Yates correction when appropriate. We considered p values of less than 0.05 statistically significant. The Spearman correlation coefficient was used to assess the strength and direction of associations between variables.

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki for human research and was approved by the ethics committee. We obtained informed consent from the parents or legal guardians of all participants and from patients older than 16 years. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03820128). Minor modifications to the registered protocol were made before study initiation, changing measurements from days 1, 3, and 5 to days 1, 2, and 3.

Results

A total of 94 children were recruited for the study. Nineteen patients were excluded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria (Fig. 1). Zonulin concentrations were measured in 61 children: 37 (60.66%) in group A (refeeding within 24hours of admission) and 24 (39.34%) in group B (refeeding at least 24hours after admission). All patients had mild AP.

Figure 1.

Flow chart of study participants.

The groups did not differ significantly in age, weight, height, body mass index, approach to diagnosis of AP, or laboratory results (Tables 1 and 2). Zonulin concentrations were similar in both groups during the first 3 days of hospitalization (Table 3). We found a weak but statistically significant positive correlation between zonulin and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase concentrations throughout the 3 days (day 1: R=0.291, P= .028; day 2: R=0.309, P= .027; day 3: R=0.331, P= .015).

Table 1.

Baseline characteristic of the groups.

  GROUP A (n=37)  GROUP B (n=24) 
Male  19 [51.4%]  10 [41.7%] 
Age (months)123.0 [82.0−177.0]  146.0 [110.5−199.5] 
25.0−210.0  28.0−213.0 
Height (cm)147.8 [121.0−163.7]  153.5 [138.5−173.5] 
85.0−183.0  89.5−188.0 
Weight (kg)37.4 [24.1−62.9]  53.1 [32.6−60.6] 
11.2−87.0  11.6−107.0 
BMI (percentile)61.0 [27.0−79.0]  67.5 [19.0−95.0] 
1.0−99.0  1.0−100.0 
Diagnosis based on:     
- laboratory tests  36  23 
- abdominal pain  36  23 
- ultrasound findings  23  14 

Abbreviation: BMI, body mass index.

Data for age height, weight and BMI presented as median [IQR] minimum-maximum values.

Refeeding groups: Group A - within 24hours of admission; Group B - more than 24hours from admission.

Table 2.

Results of laboratory tests in the two groups.

  GROUP AGROUP BP 
  median [IQR]  n  median [IQR]  n   
Amylase [U/L]           
Day 1  312.5 [166.6−844.5]  36  391.0 [122.0−954.0]  24  .96 
Day 2  204.0 [113.0−469.0]  33  176.0 [85.0−651.0]  23  .89 
Day 3  174.0 [84.0−335.0]  35  180.0 [89.0−337.0]  23  .85 
Lipase [U/L]           
Day 1  1631.5 [812.0−2892.0]  36  1137.5 [762.5−3199.0]  24  .47 
Day 2  940.0 [185.5−2189.5]  32  653.0 [289.0−1610.0]  23  .73 
Day 3  755.0 [145.0−1200.0]  35  555.1 [252.2−908.0]  23  .85 
CRP           
Day 1  0.5 [0.5−2.0]  36  1.1 [0.5−6.7]  24  .14 
Day 2  0.7 [0.5−3.5]  32  1.7 [0.5−13.3]  22  .25 
Day 3  0.5 [0.3−2.4]  34  1.0 [0.5−9.9]  22  .09 
ALT [U/L]           
Day 1  16.0 [13.0−28.0]  36  16.0 [11.0−22.0]  31  .3 
Day 2  15.0 [12.0−21.0]  31  15.0 [11.0−18.0]  24  .34 
Day 3  16.0 [12.0−24.0]  33  13.5 [10.0−21.0]  25  .16 
AST [U/L]           
Day 1  29.5 [21.0−41.5]  36  23.5 [19.3−31.5]  24  .08 
Day 2  27.5 [19.0−34.0]  30  24.0 [19.0−28.5]  20  .24 
Day 3  27.0 [19.0−31.0]  33  21.5 [19.0−27.0]  22  .29 
GGT [U/L]           
Day 1  14.0 [2.8−26.0]  35  12.5 [2.4−25.5]  24  .46 
Day 2  14.5 [3.8−80.0]  31  14.0 [3.7−24.1]  20  .56 
Day 3  19.0 [12.0−74.0]  33  15.0 [12.0−56.0]  22  .56 

Abbreviations: ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; CPR, C-reactive protein; GGT, gamma-glutamyl transferase.

Refeeding groups: Group A - within 24hours of admission; Group B - more than 24hours from admission.

Table 3.

Zonulin concentrations in the two groups.

  GROUP A    GROUP B    P 
  min-max  min-max   
  median [IQR]    median [IQR]     
Day 123.51−58.79  359.80−59.64  24.93
40.82 [35.60−48.48]  40.39 [35.30−48.93] 
Day 216.71−84.16  3724.94−58.31  24.52
43.10 [34.73−52.54]  41.14 [36.21−47.26] 
Day 318.22−77.58  351.92−75.92  23.9
41.65 [32.82−49.20]  40.88 [36.70−45.93] 

Refeeding groups: Group A - within 24hours of admission; Group B - more than 24hours from admission.

Discussion

Zonulin is used as an indirect marker of intestinal permeability. It correlates strongly to the lactulose/mannitol ratio (LMR), a test commonly applied to assess permeability in various gastrointestinal diseases and in malnutrition.22,23 In 1991, Fasano et al. identified zonula occludens toxin (Zot), an enterotoxin produced by Vibrio cholerae that causes a reversible opening of intracellular tight junctions.24,25 In 2000, the same group described zonulin, the eukaryotic counterpart of Zot, whose expression is increased in intestinal tissue during the acute phase of celiac disease.26 Zonulin activates the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), both directly and through transactivation by several G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), including PAR2.27,28 This leads to phosphorylation of target proteins and subsequent polymerization of soluble G-actin into F-actin. The resulting rearrangement of actin filaments causes the displacement of junctional proteins, including zona occludens proteins, ultimately loosening intestinal tight junctions.29

In our prospective study, zonulin levels were comparable between the two groups throughout the first three days of hospitalization.

To date, no studies assessing intestinal permeability in children with AP have been published. In most studies involving adults, permeability was evaluated using LMR, the lactulose-l-rhamnose ratio, or urinary excretion of polyethylene glycol (PEG). These studies consistently found that intestinal permeability was significantly greater in patients with AP compared with healthy controls.4–6 Permeability was also significantly greater in patients with severe AP compared to those with mild disease.6–8,30 Increased intestinal permeability was positively correlated to septic complications, longer intensive care unit stays, prolonged hospitalization, and increased mortality.7,9,10

Zonulin concentrations have also been examined in experimental rat models of AP. Consistent with findings for other permeability markers, zonulin levels were significantly higher in rats with AP than in controls and were more elevated in severe compared to mild AP.31 However, these results were not confirmed in the only clinical study that evaluated zonulin to date, which found no differences in plasma zonulin levels between controls and AP patients or between patients with mild, moderately severe, and severe AP.32 Discrepancies between animal and human studies may reflect differences in the underlying pathophysiological processes, but they may also stem from the small human sample sizes, particularly the group with severe AP (five patients).32

The impact of enteral nutrition on intestinal permeability in AP has gained increasing attention. Enteral feeding helps preserve the gut barrier and reduces bacterial and endotoxin translocation,33 whereas even 48hours of fasting markedly increases apoptosis within the intestinal mucosa.4,34 Li et al. reported that patients with AP who received enteral nutrition after two days of fasting had lower intestinal permeability than those receiving parenteral nutrition.35 Similarly, Shen et al. compared parenteral and enteral nutrition in patients with severe AP and found that intestinal permeability was significantly higher in the parenteral group 1 and 2 weeks after the intervention.36 However, none of these studies evaluated how the timing of enteral nutrition initiation affects intestinal permeability, and the small sample sizes limit the strength of their conclusions.

Our study has several limitations. The number of participants was limited (partly due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic); however, it was sufficient for statistical analysis. Because of preanalytical and laboratory errors, zonulin concentrations could not be measured in all patients. The sample size was calculated for a larger project assessing the impact of nutrition on AP, in which the primary endpoint was the length of stay, while zonulin-based assessment of intestinal permeability was a secondary endpoint. The sample only included children with mild to moderate AP, so the impact of very early nutrition on severe AP remains unknown; however, severe AP in children is rare. It should also be noted that plasma zonulin, as an indirect marker of intestinal barrier integrity, may vary between individuals, and factors such as diet or biological sex may affect its concentration.37,38 To obtain a more homogeneous cohort, we excluded patients with conditions that could affect intestinal permeability.

Very early enteral nutrition does not appear to influence intestinal barrier permeability in children with mild pancreatitis compared with early nutrition, based on plasma zonulin levels. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the pathophysiology of AP and the mechanisms by which nutrition may improve outcomes. Indirectly, they provide further evidence supporting the safety of introducing enteral nutrition as early as possible in pediatric patients with mild AP. Further studies are needed to clarify whether plasma zonulin accurately reflects AP activity in humans and to what extent.

Declaration of competing interest

The study sponsored by grant no. RG‐2/2018 obtained from NUTRICIA Foundation.

Jan Bukowski, Tatiana Jamer, Kinga Kowalska-Duplaga, Anna Stelmaszczyk-Emmel and Aleksandra Banaszkiewicz report receiving financial support from Nutricia Foundation. The remaining authors have no competing financial interests or personal relationships that could influence the work reported in this paper.

References
[1]
X.D. Wang, Q. Wang, R. Andersson, I. Ihse.
Alterations in intestinal function in acute pancreatitis in an experimental model.
Br J Surg, 83 (1996), pp. 1537-1543
[2]
G.M. Swank, E.A. Deitch.
Role of the gut in multiple organ failure: bacterial translocation and permeability changes.
World J Surg, 20 (1996), pp. 411-417
[3]
L. Huang, D. Zhang, W. Han, C. Guo.
High-mobility group box-1 inhibition stabilizes intestinal permeability through tight junctions in experimental acute necrotizing pancreatitis.
Inflamm Res, 68 (2019), pp. 677-689
[4]
U. Sonika, P. Goswami, B. Thakur, R. Yadav, P. Das, V. Ahuja, et al.
Mechanism of increased intestinal permeability in acute pancreatitis: alteration in tight junction proteins.
J Clin Gastroenterol, 51 (2017), pp. 461-466
[5]
S. Agarwal, P. Goswami, S. Poudel, D. Gunjan, N. Singh, R. Yadav, et al.
Acute pancreatitis is characterized by generalized intestinal barrier dysfunction in early stage.
Pancreatology, 23 (2023), pp. 9-17
[6]
P.O. Juvonen, E.M. Alhava, J.A. Takala.
Gut permeability in patients with acute pancreatitis.
Scand J Gastroenterol, 35 (2000), pp. 1314-1318
[7]
H. Liu, W. Li, X. Wang, J. Li, W. Yu.
Early gut mucosal dysfunction in patients with acute pancreatitis.
Pancreas, 36 (2008), pp. 192-196
[8]
B.J. Ammori, P.C. Leeder, R.F.G.J. King, G.R. Barclay, I.G. Martin, M. Larvin, et al.
Early increase in intestinal permeability in patients with severe acute pancreatitis: correlation with endotoxemia, organ failure, and mortality.
J Gastrointest Surg, 3 (1999), pp. 252-262
[9]
Y.Y. Koh, W.K. Jeon, Y.K. Cho, H.J. Kim, W.G. Chung, C.U. Chon, et al.
The effect of intestinal permeability and endotoxemia on the prognosis of acute pancreatitis.
Gut Liver, 6 (2012), pp. 505-511
[10]
K. Nagpal, V.R. Minocha, V. Agrawal, S. Kapur.
Evaluation of intestinal mucosal permeability function in patients with acute pancreatitis.
Am J Surg, 192 (2006), pp. 24-28
[11]
W. Wang, S. Uzzau, S.E. Goldblum, A. Fasano.
Human zonulin, a potential modulator of intestinal tight junctions.
J Cell Sci, 113 (2000), pp. 4435-4440
[12]
J. Lariño-Noia, B. Lindkvist, J. Iglesias-García, S. Seijo-Ríos, J. Iglesias-Canle, J.E. Domínguez-Muñoz.
Early and/or immediately full caloric diet versus standard refeeding in mild acute pancreatitis: a randomized open-label trial.
Pancreatology, 14 (2014), pp. 167-173
[13]
J.M.M. Moraes, G.E.G. Felga, L.A. Chebli, M.B. Franco, C.A. Gomes, P.D. Gaburri, et al.
A full solid diet as the initial meal in mild acute pancreatitis is safe and result in a shorter length of hospitalization: results from a prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial.
J Clin Gastroenterol, 44 (2010), pp. 517-522
[14]
G.E. Eckerwall, B.B.Å Tingstedt, P.E. Bergenzaun, R.G. Andersson.
Immediate oral feeding in patients with mild acute pancreatitis is safe and may accelerate recovery—a randomized clinical study.
Clin Nutr, 26 (2007), pp. 758-763
[15]
M. Al-Omran, Z.H. AlBalawi, M.F. Tashkandi, L.A. Al-Ansary.
Enteral versus parenteral nutrition for acute pancreatitis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2010 (2010),
[16]
X.L. Zhao, S.F. Zhu, G.J. Xue, J. Li, Y.L. Liu, M.H. Wan, et al.
Early oral refeeding based on hunger in moderate and severe acute pancreatitis: a prospective controlled, randomized clinical trial.
Nutrition, 31 (2015), pp. 171-175
[17]
A.C.J. Windsor, S. Kanwar, A.G.K. Li, E. Barnes, J.A. Guthrie, J.I. Spark, et al.
Compared with parenteral nutrition, enteral feeding attenuates the acute phase response and improves disease severity in acute pancreatitis.
Gut, 42 (1998), pp. 431-435
[18]
M. Abu-El-Haija, S. Kumar, J.A. Quiros, K. Balakrishnan, B. Barth, S. Bitton, et al.
Management of acute pancreatitis in the pediatric population: a clinical report from the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Pancreas Committee.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr, 66 (2018), pp. 159-176
[19]
M. Abu-El-Haija, A. Uc, S.L. Werlin, A.J. Freeman, M. Georgieva, D. Jojkić-Pavkov, et al.
Nutritional considerations in pediatric pancreatitis: a position paper from the NASPGHAN Pancreas Committee and ESPGHAN Cystic Fibrosis/Pancreas Working Group.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr., 67 (2018), pp. 131-143
[20]
M. Abu-El-Haija, S. Kumar, F. Szabo, S. Werlin, D. Conwell, P. Banks, et al.
Classification of acute pancreatitis in the pediatric population: Clinical Report From the NASPGHAN Pancreas Committee.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr, 64 (2017), pp. 984-990
[21]
E. Sathiaraj, S. Murthy, M.J. Mansard, G.V. Rao, S. Mahukar, D.N. Reddy.
Clinical trial: oral feeding with a soft diet compared with clear liquid diet as initial meal in mild acute pancreatitis.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 28 (2008), pp. 777-781
[22]
A. Sapone, L. De Magistris, M. Pietzak, M.G. Clemente, A. Tripathi, F. Cucca, et al.
Zonulin upregulation is associated with increased gut permeability in subjects with type 1 diabetes and their relatives.
Diabetes, 55 (2006), pp. 1443-1449
[23]
M. Generoso, M. De Rosa, R. De Rosa, L. De Magistris, M. Secondulfo, R. Fiandra, et al.
Cellobiose and lactulose coupled with mannitol and determined using ion-exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection, are reliable probes for investigation of intestinal permeability.
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci, 783 (2003), pp. 349-357
[24]
A. Fasano, B. Baudry, D.W. Pumplin, S.S. Wasserman, B.D. Tall, J.M. Ketley, et al.
Vibrio cholerae produces a second enterotoxin, which affects intestinal tight junctions.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 88 (1991), pp. 5242-5246
[25]
M. Di Pierro, R. Lu, S. Uzzau, W. Wang, K. Margaretten, C. Pazzani, et al.
Zonula occludens toxin structure-function analysis.
J Biol Chem, 276 (2001), pp. 19160-19165
[26]
A. Fasano, T. Not, W. Wang, S. Uzzau, I. Berti, A. Tommasini, et al.
Zonulin, a newly discovered modulator of intestinal permeability, and its expression in coeliac disease.
Lancet, 355 (2000), pp. 1518-1519
[27]
A. Tripathi, K.M. Lammers, S. Goldblum, T. Shea-Donohue, S. Netzel-Arnett, M.S. Buzza, et al.
Identification of human zonulin, a physiological modulator of tight junctions, as prehaptoglobin-2.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 106 (2009), pp. 16799-16804
[28]
J.Q. Van Der Merwe, M.D. Hollenberg, W.K. MacNaughton.
EGF receptor transactivation and MAP kinase mediate proteinase-activated receptor-2-induced chloride secretion in intestinal epithelial cells.
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, 294 (2008), pp. G441-51
[29]
A. Fasano.
Regulation of intercellular tight junctions by zonula occludens toxin and its eukaryotic analogue zonulin.
Annals N Y Acad Sci, 915 (2000), pp. 214-222
[30]
J.C. Penalva, J. Martínez, R. Laveda, A. Esteban, C. Muñoz, J. Sáez, et al.
A study of intestinal permeability in relation to the inflammatory response and plasma endocab IgM levels in patients with acute pancreatitis.
J Clin Gastroenterol, 38 (2004), pp. 512-517
[31]
A. Yildiz, B.P. Kundaktepe, S. Yuksekdag, S. Durmus, Z.K. Silav, R. Gelisgen, et al.
Akut pankreatitli sıçanlarda bağırsak geçirgenliğinin değerlendirilmesinde serum ve bağırsak dokusu zonulin düzeyleri.
Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, (2022), http://dx.doi.org/10.9775/kvfd.2021.26832
[32]
U. Avcioglu, H. Eruzun.
Serum zonulin levels as an early biomarker in predicting the severity and complications of acute pancreatitis.
Eurasian J Med, 55 (2023), pp. 78-82
[33]
P. Lehocky, M.G. Sarr.
Early enteral feeding in severe acute pancreatitis: can it prevent secondary pancreatic (super) infection?.
Dig Surg, 17 (2000), pp. 571-577
[34]
K. Fukuyama, R. Iwakiri, T. Noda, M. Kojima, H. Utsumi, S. Tsunada, et al.
Apoptosis induced by ischemia-reperfusion and fasting in gastric mucosa compared to small intestinal mucosa in rats.
Dig Dis Sci, 46 (2001), pp. 545-549
[35]
P. Li, J.N. Jian, R.L. Chen.
Effect of early enteral nutrition on serum inflammatory factors and intestinal mucosal permeability in patients with severe acute pancreatitis.
Turk J Gastroenterol, 32 (2021), pp. 907-912
[36]
Q.X. Shen, G.X. Xu, M.H. Shen.
Effect of early enteral nutrition (EN) on endotoxin in serum and intestinal permeability in patients with severe acute pancreatitis.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 21 (2017), pp. 2764-2768
[37]
N. Haskey, M. Eisle, A. Bruno, R.A. Reimer, M. Yousuf, L.M. Taylor, et al.
Biomarkers of intestinal permeability are influenced by diet in patients with ulcerative colitis - an exploratory study.
Diagnostics, 14 (2024), pp. 2629
[38]
A. Maget, N. Dalkner, C. Hamm, S. Bengesser, F. Fellendorf, M. Platzer, et al.
Sex differences in zonulin in affective disorders and ssociations with current mood symptoms.
J Affect Disord, 294 (2021), pp. 441-446
Copyright © 2026. Asociación Española de Pediatría
Download PDF
Idiomas
Anales de Pediatría (English Edition)
Article options
Tools