We searched PubMed between Jan 1, 1989, and March 1, 2016, with the terms “hemolytic uremic syndrome”, “thrombotic microangiopathy”, “shigatoxin”, “pneumococcus”, “cobalamin C defect”, “complement”, and “eculizumab” in combination with the terms “pathophysiology”, “diagnosis”, “causes”, and “treatment”. We restricted our search to English and French publications. We selected reports from the past 5 years but did not exclude important and highly cited older publications. We searched the
SeminarHaemolytic uraemic syndrome
Introduction
Haemolytic uraemic syndrome is a rare but severe disease that has in the past two decades generated many studies. Experimental and genetic studies have helped to decipher the pathophysiology of various forms of haemolytic uraemic syndrome, while clinical studies have better delineated the picture and improved diagnosis. These breakthroughs have paved the way for new targeted therapies. Haemolytic uraemic syndrome is a rapidly evolving field but is one of the best examples of precision medicine—ie, tailored mechanism-based treatment—and of how translational research can improve the management of a disease. In this Seminar, we discuss the definitions and classifications, pathophysiology, genetics, clinical presentation, diagnostics, and management of haemolytic uraemic syndrome subsets.
Section snippets
Definitions and classifications
Haemolytic uraemic syndrome belongs to a range of thrombotic microangiopathies and arises from an initial endothelial cell injury. The term thrombotic microangiopathy refers primarily to pathological features of vascular damage. In haemolytic uraemic syndrome, these features are documented mainly in the kidney as fibrin and platelet thrombi in capillaries and arterioles, endothelial cell swelling and detachment from the glomerular basement membrane, and the appearance of so-called double
Incidence and epidemiology
In children with haemolytic uraemic syndrome, the proportion with STEC–haemolytic uraemic syndrome is 85–90%, atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome is 5–10%, and S pneumoniae–haemolytic uraemic syndrome is about 5%. By contrast, the respective frequency of haemolytic uraemic syndrome secondary to coexisting diseases or conditions, or infections; and atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome is not precisely documented in adults.
Although the frequency of invasive pneumococcal disease substantially
Pathophysiology
The common feature to all forms of haemolytic uraemic syndrome is the presence of endothelial cell lesions in the microvasculature of the kidney and, less frequently, of other organs. The trigger of endothelial cell lesions might be extrinsic and transient, such as Streptococcus pneumoniae or STEC infections, drugs, or cancer. In these settings, the thrombotic microangiopathy process usually abates once the trigger has been removed or controlled, with no risk of relapse. Conversely, the driving
Genetics
Haemolytic uraemic syndrome can be a familial monogenic recessive disease caused by pathogenic variants in a single gene (cblC-defect–haemolytic uraemic syndrome4 and DGKE–haemolytic uraemic syndrome6). Complement–haemolytic uraemic syndrome is frequently sporadic (85% of families2) despite presence of pathogenic variants in complement genes in the patient and one of their healthy parents. These findings suggest that the genetic background predisposes the patient to the disease rather than
Clinical presentation
The clinical symptoms of haemolytic uraemic syndrome are non-specific and include fatigue, pallor, shortness of breath, reduced urine output, and oedema. STEC–haemolytic uraemic syndrome frequently follows prodromic bloody diarrhoea88, 89, 90 (appendix pp 4, 5) and by contrast has seldom been reported after STEC urinary tract infection.91 S pneumoniae–haemolytic uraemic syndrome occurs in individuals with severe S pneumoniae sepsis, associated usually with pleural or pulmonary infection, and in
Diagnostic investigations and differential diagnosis
A practical diagnostic approach of patients suspected of haemolytic uraemic syndrome is detailed in figure 3.105, 106, 107 Several working groups have proposed diagnostic algorithms.1, 19, 108, 109 This approach relies on stepwise procedures, which aim to confirm or rule out distinct causative forms of haemolytic uraemic syndrome on the basis of direct tests. However, diagnosis of atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome can be made by default when other causes have been eliminated with a
Management and outcome
Supportive therapy (appendix p 10) is the cornerstone of haemolytic uraemic syndrome treatment and has largely contributed to the decrease in mortality following development of any form of haemolytic uraemic syndrome.
S pneumoniae–haemolytic uraemic syndrome
Early recognition and prompt initiation of antibiotics (mainly amoxicillin or third generation cephalosporin in case of meningitis) with supportive intensive care largely accounts for the improvement of S pneumoniae–haemolytic uraemic syndrome outcomes in the past two decades (appendix pp 4, 5). Because plasma contains anti-Thomsen–Friedenreich antibodies, which might enhance agglutination of Thomsen–Friedenreich-anti-Thomsen–Friedenreich and worsen haemolytic uraemic syndrome course, plasma
Outcome and predictive factors
Central to management of STEC–haemolytic uraemic syndrome is early assessment of haemolytic uraemic syndrome severity, which correlates with the risk of sequelae (appendix pp 4, 5). Overall, early death rates have been reduced to 1·4–2·9% in children since the early 2000s;89, 118 whereas people aged 60 years or older still have the highest risk of death.15 In the same period, the proportion of children who progressed to end-stage renal disease was 1·4%, or had renal (chronic kidney disease
Outcome and predictive factors
Before eculizumab was available for treatment of haemolytic uraemic syndrome, the death rate (reported in two European cohorts)2, 3 was higher in children than in adults (8–14% vs 2–4%) at 3–5 years' follow-up. Conversely, the rate of end-stage renal disease was higher in adults than in children (table 2 and appendix pp 4, 5).2, 3 In adults, outcomes were similarly poor irrespective of whether a patient had a complement variant or not. CFH–haemolytic uraemic syndrome had the most severe
Secondary haemolytic uraemic syndrome
Haemolytic uraemic syndrome associated with coexisting diseases or conditions comprise a heterogeneous group, of a variety of types of endothelial cell damage (table 1). The identification of complement alternative pathway dysregulation as a major driver of atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome has prompted some investigators to reconsider the pathogenesis of secondary haemolytic uraemic syndrome, leading for instance to the reclassification of pregnancy–haemolytic uraemic syndrome. Similarly,
Haemolytic uraemic syndrome in pregnancy
Pregnancy can trigger different types of thrombotic microangiopathies, including ADAMTS13-deficiency–thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (mostly during the second and third trimesters), haemolytic uraemic syndrome (mostly in peripartum or post-partum), and HELLP (haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count) syndrome, a thrombotic microangiopathy affecting the liver and inconstantly the kidney (table 1). Features of thrombotic microangiopathy might also be encountered in severe
Renal transplantation and haemolytic uraemic syndrome
The different forms of haemolytic uraemic syndrome whose pathogenic mechanism primarily involves damage to the endothelial cells by environmental factors have a low rate of recurrence after kidney transplantation. By contrast, atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome related to complement alternative pathway dysregulation, involving circulating factors, is associated with a high rate of recurrence after kidney transplantation (appendix p 16). Importantly, in the pre-eculizumab era, atypical
Conclusion
Much has been achieved in the field of haemolytic uraemic syndrome in the past 10 years (appendix p 17). A mechanistic approach of haemolytic uraemic syndrome has been developed, an innovative efficacious treatment— the anti-C5 antibody eculizumab—has been made available for atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome, and new mechanisms of pathogenesis have been identified. Several aspects remain unclear. Reliable biomarkers for the diagnosis and monitoring of haemolytic uraemic syndrome are missing.
Search strategy and selection criteria
References (161)
- et al.
Management of hemolytic uremic syndrome
Presse Med
(2012) - et al.
Loss of DGKɛ induces endothelial cell activation and death independently of complement activation
Blood
(2015) - et al.
Cobalamin C defect associated with hemolytic-uremic syndrome
J Pediatr
(1992) - et al.
Mutations in complement C3 predispose to development of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome
Blood
(2008) - et al.
Drug-induced thrombotic microangiopathy: a systematic review of published reports
Blood
(2015) - et al.
A new paradigm: diagnosis and management of HSCT-associated thrombotic microangiopathy as multi-system endothelial injury
Blood Rev
(2015) - et al.
Abnormalities in the alternative pathway of complement in children with hematopoietic stem cell transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy
Blood
(2013) - et al.
The genetic fingerprint of susceptibility for transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy
Blood
(2016) - et al.
Eculizumab therapy in children with severe hematopoietic stem cell transplantation-associated thrombotic microangiopathy
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant
(2014) - et al.
Complement mutation-associated de novo thrombotic microangiopathy following kidney transplantation
Am J Transplant
(2008)