Original ContributionWhat biomechanical factors are more important in compression depth for children lifesavers? A randomized crossover study
Introduction
Cardiac arrest is one of the leading causes of death in developed countries [1]. Bystander CPR has the potential to improve outcomes [2,3]. One possibility to improve this might be to implement a basic life support (BLS) program at schools. Some evidence shows that implementing a BLS program at school increased the percentages of resuscitation attempts made by witnesses in future years [[4], [5], [6]]. Maybe “Kids save lives” would be the way to improve outcomes in cases of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA) [7,8]. Teaching BLS at school has several advantages, with positive pedagogical connotation and with a positive cost-benefit relationship [9,10].
In recent years, several studies have pointed towards age as an important factor for QCPR in children as lifesavers. These studies suggest that 12–13 years-old is the approximate age to perform CPR with an acceptable quality from a physical and cognitive point of view [7,[11], [12], [13], [14], [15]]. Multiple studies point out the importance of variables such as body mass index (BMI) and physical fitness [16,17], weight [18,19], and other anthropometric variables like length of the forearm and femur [20].
In ERC 2015 guidelines, emphasis is placed on arm positioning, vertically straight over the victim's chest [21]. One study found rescuers perform better QCPR when chest compressions are done with a 90-degree arm angle over the victims' chest compared with less than a 90-degree arm angle [22]. Moreover, several studies have found an improvement in quality when using a step to perform CPR on a stretcher [20,22,23].
Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the different biomechanical factors involved in compression depth of CPR performed by children. In addition, the differences in angulation and CPR quality depending on the elevation with children were analyzed.
Section snippets
Participants
A total of 196 children (125 girls and 71 boys) in the city of Pontevedra (Spain) were included in the study. Ages of these kids ranged from 9 to 14 years-old. Inclusion criteria were: voluntary participation, parental authorization, written consent and to complete all phases of the study. Excluding criteria were: physical limitations not compatible with performing the CPR and no consent from their parents. None of the participants had previous CPR experience.
Design
A crossover randomized
Results
The age of the participants was: 9 years-old (20.9%), 10 years-old (16.3%), 11 years-old (23.5%), 12 years-old (18.9%), 13 years-old (16.3%) and 14 years-old (4.1%). The anthropometric variables of the whole sample were: Age (11.06 ± 1.50 years-old), Height (148.90 ± 10.01 cm), Forearm length (22.43 ± 1.66 cm), Arm length (48.77 ± 3.74 cm), Femur length (41.27 ± 3.97 cm), Weight (44.15 ± 10.47 kg) and BMI (19.73 ± 3.23 kg/m2). Anthropometric data of participants are shown in Online Table 1.
Discussion
Children are a key target for CPR training [8,11,33]. Previous studies suggest 9–10 years-old as the approximate age when children can learn to perform CPR and retain that knowledge [34,35]. However, due to their physical characteristics, scientific evidence points out that the age to perform CPR with an acceptable quality is 12–13 years-old [7,[11], [12], [13], [14], [15]]. This study analyzed the influence of children's body parameters and elevation on CPR quality.
The results obtained suggest
Conclusions
The results obtained in this study show a sub-optimal CPR quality in all step heights tested. The use of steps increased arm's angle, getting it closer to 90°. However, to use steps in children does not increase CPR quality since on the floor. Finally, data show that compression depth by children depends on anthropometric characteristics, with 12-year-old being the approximate age for having an acceptable CPR quality. Children perform a sub-optimal CPR quality due to their physical
Conflicts of interest
The authors of this study declare that they not to have any conflict of interest, either personal or financial, in relation with this research.
References (36)
- et al.
Emergency response time after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Eur J Intern Med
(2011) - et al.
Board of European Resuscitation Council (ERC). Kids Save Lives—ERC position statement on school children education in CPR.: “Hands that help—training children is training for life”
Resuscitation
(2016) - et al.
CPR knowledge and attitude to performing bystander CPR among secondary school students in Norway
Resuscitation
(2011) - et al.
Teaching basic life support to 12–16 year olds in Barcelona schools: views of head teachers
Resuscitation
(2006) - et al.
How best to teach CPR to schoolchildren: a systematic review
Resuscitation
(2013) - et al.
Schoolchildren as life savers: at what age do they become strong enough?
Resuscitation
(2014) - et al.
Rescuers' effect on active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ACD-CPR) operating
Am J Emerg Med
(2003) - et al.
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 2. Adult basic life support and automated external defibrillation
Resuscitation
(2015) - et al.
The impact of a step stool on cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a cross-over mannequin study
Resuscitation
(2012) Learning CPR at school-everyone should do it
Resuscitation
(2012)