Major Article
Surveillance of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacilli in a neonatal intensive care unit: prominent role of cross transmission

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2006.04.210Get rights and content

Background

Multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacilli (MDRGN) are an important cause of nosocomial infections in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). We conducted a 1-year prospective surveillance study in an NICU to assess the epidemiology of MDRGN among newborns and the relative importance of acquisition routes.

Methods

Neonates admitted at the NICU of the Dipartimento Materno-Infantile, University Hospital, Palermo, Italy, from January 7, 2003, to January 6, 2004, were included in the study. Colonization of patients with MDRGN was assessed by cultures of rectal swabs sampled twice a week. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis was used to determine relatedness among MDRGN isolates. Extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL) and metallo-β-lactamases (MBL) production was investigated. The association between risk factors at admission and during the NICU stay was analyzed by multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Results

During the 12-month period January 7, 2003, through January 6, 2004, 1021 rectal swabs were cultured from 210 infants. One hundred sixteen infants (55.2%) were colonized by MDRGN. The monthly incidence of acquisition of MDRGN ranged between 12 and 53 cases per 1000 patient-days. Eighty-four (72.4%) of the 116 patients were cross colonized. Exclusive feeding by formula was significantly associated with cross transmission (RR = 1.8, P = .02). Fifty-seven (49.1%) of the 116 infants were colonized by ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Feeding by formula was significantly associated with colonization by ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae (RR = 1.6, P = .007), whereas breastfeeding proved to be protective (RR = 0.5, P = .001). Ninety-two (43.8%) of the 210 infants received antibiotics during the NICU stay, but exposure to those most frequently administered, ampicillin-sulbactam and gentamicin, was not significantly associated with MDRGN colonization.

Conclusion

The emerging picture of this study is that spread of MDRGN in an NICU may be the result of diffuse cross transmission and, consequently, of poor infection control procedures.

Section snippets

Setting

We conducted a 1-year prospective surveillance study in the NICU of the University Hospital of Palermo, Italy. The unit is part of the Dipartmento Materno-Infantile, which is a reference center for congenital malformation in Sicily. The department includes also units of infertility and assisted reproduction and materno-fetal medicine. In the NICU under study, approximately 200 patients are usually admitted annually, including approximately 15% of VLBW newborns (birthweight <1500 g). The NICU is

General

During the 12-month period January 7, 2003, through January 6, 2004, a total of 221 neonates were admitted to the NICU for at least 48 hours. Among these, only 11 missed rectal swab cultures and were excluded from further analysis.

A total of 1021 rectal swab cultures were sequentially obtained from 210 infants. The characteristics of the study population are summarized in Table 1. The average length of stay was 22.3 days (median, 13 days; range, 3-140). Ninety-two (43.8%) infants received

Discussion

MDRGN organisms are becoming the prevalent causal agents of infection in NICUs.20 Epidemiologic features of circulation of these organisms have been described by several authors, who have identified risk factors for colonization and infection and applied molecular tracing as a tool for assessing transmission pathways and cross-transmission burden and addressing drug-resistance control strategies.4, 6, 8, 9, 10

Our study showed a colonization rate higher than that reported by some previous studies

References (31)

  • G. Bisson et al.

    Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella species: risk factors for colonization and impact of antimicrobial formulary interventions on colonization prevalence

    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol

    (2002)
  • E.M. D'Agata et al.

    Molecular epidemiology of ceftazidime-resistant gram-negative bacilli on inanimate surfaces and their role in cross-transmission during nonoutbreak periods

    J Clin Microbiol

    (1999)
  • S. Harbarth et al.

    Outbreak of Enterobacter cloacae related to understaffing, overcrowding, and poor hygiene practices

    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol

    (1999)
  • P. Toltzis et al.

    Molecular epidemiology of antibiotic resistant gram-negative bacilli in a neonatal intensive care unit during a nonoutbreak period

    Pediatrics

    (2001)
  • V. Waters et al.

    Molecular epidemiology of gram-negative bacilli from infected neonates and health care workers' hands in neonatal intensive care units

    Clin Infect Dis

    (2004)
  • Cited by (81)

    • Beta lactam

      2022, Comprehensive Pharmacology
    • The relationship between Gram-negative colonization and bloodstream infections in neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis

      2018, Clinical Microbiology and Infection
      Citation Excerpt :

      Apart from one study [23], all papers assessed colonization through rectal swab or stool culture (Table S2). Twenty-four (88.9%) out of 27 studies provided information about timing and frequency of microbiological screening [4,6,8,9,17–36]. In nearly half of the studies, rectal/skin swabs were performed weekly through the baby's NICU stay [4,6,17,19,20,24–30,32,33], whereas in six studies neonates were screened twice a week [8,21,22,31,35,36].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text