Brief report
Parent Evaluation of Spasticity Treatment in Cerebral Palsy Using Botulinum Toxin Type A

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2006.08.343Get rights and content

Abstract

Symons FJ, Rivard PF, Nugent AC, Tervo RC. Parent evaluation of spasticity treatment in cerebral palsy using botulinum toxin type A.

Objective

To assess parent ratings of treatment acceptability associated with botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) injection for spasticity in children with cerebral palsy (CP).

Design

A single-point survey design across a sequentially recruited cohort, using a standardized evaluation measure.

Setting

Regional specialty health care center medical clinic and pain research program.

Participants

Fifty-nine parents of children with CP receiving BTX-A injection for spasticity.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measure

The Treatment Evaluation Inventory.

Results

Overall, parent ratings of treatment acceptability ranged from moderate to high. There were no significant differences for caregiver ratings in relation to characteristics of the raters (age, sex, marital status) or of the children (age, sex, mental retardation, severity of disability) characteristics.

Conclusions

These findings indicate that on average, parents of children with CP consider BTX-A treatment for the management of spasticity to be an acceptable form of treatment.

Section snippets

Participants and Setting

After receiving institutional review board approval for the study, we formed a convenience sample. Sixty-five consecutive care providers (eg, parents, foster parents) who brought their children for BTX-A injections to an outpatient, hospital-based clinic of a large regional children’s specialty health care center in Minneapolis were asked to complete a treatment evaluation survey. On checking in, care providers were given the survey and asked to complete it before the clinic appointment began.

Results

Sixty surveys were returned (92%) and 59 (98%) were retained (1 survey was not completed correctly). Forty-three (74%) were completed by female respondents (79% biologic mothers) from 2 parent households (80%). The mean age of all respondents ± standard deviation (SD), was 41.5±9.2 years (range, 22.9−69.5y). The patients ranged in age from 10.8 months to 39 years (mean, 10.9y) and 38 (64%) were boys. Twenty-two percent (n=13) of the respondents characterized their child’s disability as mild,

Discussion

Our main purpose in this preliminary survey was to evaluate parental report of the acceptability of BTX-A treatment for their child’s spasticity, and to evaluate whether treatment acceptability ratings varied in relation to parent or child demographics. Overall, there were moderate to high levels of satisfaction reported and no significant differences were found for raters in regard to age of parent rater or child, sex of parent rater or child, marital status of parent rater, severity of

Conclusions

The value of evaluating treatment procedures and outcomes from different perspectives is underscored by increasing emphasis on measures that complement but go beyond traditional clinical efficacy endpoints.5 One reason for this is a need to understand the factors that influence whether patients and their families adhere to treatments. A treatment may be efficacious but have little impact if it is not followed or implemented. In this study, the TEI provided preliminary evidence that parents

References (10)

  • L.A. Koman et al.

    Botulinum toxin type A neuromuscular blockage in the treatment of lower extremity spasticity in cerebral palsy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trialBOTOX Study Group

    J Pediatr Orthop

    (2000)
  • J. Wissell et al.

    Management of spasticity associated pain with botulinum toxin A

    J Pain Sympt Manage

    (2000)
  • H. Satila et al.

    Botulinum toxin treatment of spastic equinus in cerebral palsy: a randomized trial comparing two injection sites

    Am J Phys Med Rehabil

    (2005)
  • M.L. McCarthy et al.

    The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory: an evaluation of its reliability and validity for children with traumatic brain injury

    Arch Phys Med Rehabil

    (2005)
  • M.E. Gormley et al.

    Use of botulinum toxin type A in pediatric patients with cerebral palsy: a three-center retrospective chart review

    J Child Neurol

    (2001)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (11)

  • Visual Analogue Scale to score the effects of Botulinum Toxin A treatment in children with cerebral palsy in daily clinical practice

    2008, European Journal of Paediatric Neurology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Several studies have shown the benefits of intramuscular Botulinum Toxin Type A (BTX-A) injections for the management of spasticity in children with CP.3–5 Studies indicate that parents of children with CP consider BTX-A treatment to be an acceptable form of treatment.6 BTX-A inhibits cholinergic transmission at neuromuscular synapses and relaxes muscles.

  • Parental Evaluation and Botulinum Toxin Type A

    2007, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • Can Biomarkers Differentiate Pain and No Pain Subgroups of Nonverbal Children with Cerebral Palsy? A Preliminary Investigation Based on Noninvasive Saliva Sampling

    2015, Pain Medicine (United States)
    Citation Excerpt :

    This may be because biochemical factors, which are undetectable by imaging, are contributing to a chronic pain state. Because of problems related to self-report and cognitive, motor, and sensory impairments, adequate pain management often eludes individuals with neurodevelopmental disabilities [7]. Therapeutic decisions are frequently based on trial and error, creating a situation frustrating to physicians and nurses as well as individual patients and their families.

View all citing articles on Scopus

Supported in part by a McKnight Land-Grant Professorship.

No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.

View full text