Three-dimensional evaluation of secondary alveolar bone grafting using a 3D- navigation system based on computed tomography: a two-year follow-up

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2007.12.010Get rights and content

Abstract

Secondary bone grafting is widely used in the closure of oronasal fistulas and reconstruction of maxillary defects. It often fails from lack of physiological stress or inadequate covering of the transplanted bone with surrounding tissue. The aim of this study was to assess the exact bone volume after secondary alveolar bone grafting over a period of two years using a navigation system based on computed tomography (CT).

We examined 20 patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) who had been treated by secondary bone grafting during late mixed dentition. CT scans of the upper jaw were taken immediately preoperatively, and 1 and 2 years postoperatively. The cleft defects and the bony bridges were marked on the monitor. The software of the navigation system created three-dimensional models showing the amount and site of bone resorption.

The mean bone loss after one and two years was 51% and 52%, respectively. There was a significant correlation between the size of the cleft and the success of the alveolar bone grafting (p = 0.01). When the teeth adjacent to the cleft were missing the amount of bone lost was 95% after the first year. There was also significant bone loss in the buccopalatine direction.

Three-dimensional reconstruction of the bony bridges with a navigation system accurately shows the amount of bone within the cleft site. This method is definitely superior to conventional two-dimensional orthopantomography.

Introduction

Primary osteoplasty at the time of initial repair of the lip or shortly afterwards as described by Schuchardt1 was the common treatment for reconstruction of alveolar cleft defects before the 1970s. During the following period, gingivoperiosteoplasty has been proposed as an alternative to primary bone grafting until secondary autogenous bone grafting was introduced and became the method of choice in the 1980s.2 The primary objective of secondary bone grafting is uniting and stabilising the alveolar segments before definitive orthodontic and restorative dental treatment.3 This technique has been standard practice for almost 30 years and has shown favourable results.

Radiographic measurements of bone resorption in relation to interalveolar bone height are the criteria for evaluation of success in most studies.4, 5, 6 The Bergland grading system of measuring the success of a bone graft has remained the gold standard and is used most often.2, 5, 7, 8 It is based on a comparison of the occlusal level of the interdental bone graft with that of the normal site on a four-point scale.

Although bone remodelling and two-dimensional changes can to a certain extent be evaluated by conventional radiographs, the failure of plain films to assess the changes in volume, morphology, and bony architecture are disadvantages inherent in the method. Lawson and Jones9 tried to overcome this problem using ultrasound in a porcine experimental model and found it useful when combined with radiography, but unreliable for deep clefts. More recently CT scans have been used to evaluate the outcome of secondary alveolar bone grafting.10, 11

The purpose of the present study was to illustrate the change in bone volume over a period of two years by creating three-dimensional models of the bony bridges on a computer workstation.

Section snippets

Patients and methods

We studied CT scans from 20 patients with complete UCLP, 14 of whom had unilateral clefts on the left, and 6 who had clefts on the right. There were 9 girls and 11 boys, aged from 9 to 15 years. All patients had undergone secondary bone grafting with particulate cancellous bone and marrow taken from the anterior iliac crest. The mean age at operation was 11 years, and the bone was grafted when two thirds of the root of the permanent canine were visible on orthopantomography. The technique was

Data acquisition

Axial CT scans were taken immediately preoperatively, and 1 and 2 years postoperatively using a high resolution ultrafast CT scanner (Imatron Electron Beam Tomography, Siemens, Forchheim, Germany). Slices taken from the nasal tip to the occlusal plane were 1.5 mm thick with an increment of 1 mm, resulting in about 15 slices with overlapping images.

Display of images and data

All images from the CT scans were transferred to a commercially available navigation system (STN-Zeiss-Navigation System, Aalen, Germany) for volumetric analysis. Each alveolar cleft and bony bridge after 1 and 2 years were seen on the workstation monitor in multiplanar reformations using the imagedata processing software of the navigation system. The defect in the alveolar cleft and the transplanted bone were then outlined on each slice using the drawing tools of the navigation system (Fig. 1).

Ethics

The study was conducted in accordance with the moral, ethical, regulatory and scientific principles governing clinical research as set out in the Declaration of Helsinki (2004).

Results

The mean preoperative volume of the cleft defect was 1.2 (0.3) cm3, (range 0.7–1.7 cm3). The volume of residual bone in the cleft area after 1 year was 0.6 (0.4) cm3 (49%), (range 0–1.4 cm3). After two years the amount of bone remaining had decreased to 0.6 (0.4) cm3 (48%; range 0–1.3 cm3). The ratio of residual bony volume to the size of preoperative defect was 51% after one, and 50% after two, years, respectively (Table 1).

In 11 of the 20 patients the remaining bone after 1 year was less than

Discussion

Traditionally, the reported ways of evaluating alveolar bone grafts in patients with cleft lip and palate have been occlusal, periapical, or panoramic radiographs.2, 6, 16, 17 A lot of studies achieved success rates between 80% and 90% using the Oslo grading system as described by Bergland et al.5, 6, 7, 12, 18

The principle of evaluating the success of a bone graft on a two-dimensional image is that there is a significant correlation between height of the bone, calculated from two-dimensional

References (22)

  • O. Bergland et al.

    Elimination of the residual alveolar cleft by secondary bone grafting and subsequent orthodontic treatment

    Cleft Palate J

    (1986)
  • Cited by (88)

    • What is the Success Rate of Repeat Alveolar Bone Graft?

      2024, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text