Three-dimensional evaluation of secondary alveolar bone grafting using a 3D- navigation system based on computed tomography: a two-year follow-up
Introduction
Primary osteoplasty at the time of initial repair of the lip or shortly afterwards as described by Schuchardt1 was the common treatment for reconstruction of alveolar cleft defects before the 1970s. During the following period, gingivoperiosteoplasty has been proposed as an alternative to primary bone grafting until secondary autogenous bone grafting was introduced and became the method of choice in the 1980s.2 The primary objective of secondary bone grafting is uniting and stabilising the alveolar segments before definitive orthodontic and restorative dental treatment.3 This technique has been standard practice for almost 30 years and has shown favourable results.
Radiographic measurements of bone resorption in relation to interalveolar bone height are the criteria for evaluation of success in most studies.4, 5, 6 The Bergland grading system of measuring the success of a bone graft has remained the gold standard and is used most often.2, 5, 7, 8 It is based on a comparison of the occlusal level of the interdental bone graft with that of the normal site on a four-point scale.
Although bone remodelling and two-dimensional changes can to a certain extent be evaluated by conventional radiographs, the failure of plain films to assess the changes in volume, morphology, and bony architecture are disadvantages inherent in the method. Lawson and Jones9 tried to overcome this problem using ultrasound in a porcine experimental model and found it useful when combined with radiography, but unreliable for deep clefts. More recently CT scans have been used to evaluate the outcome of secondary alveolar bone grafting.10, 11
The purpose of the present study was to illustrate the change in bone volume over a period of two years by creating three-dimensional models of the bony bridges on a computer workstation.
Section snippets
Patients and methods
We studied CT scans from 20 patients with complete UCLP, 14 of whom had unilateral clefts on the left, and 6 who had clefts on the right. There were 9 girls and 11 boys, aged from 9 to 15 years. All patients had undergone secondary bone grafting with particulate cancellous bone and marrow taken from the anterior iliac crest. The mean age at operation was 11 years, and the bone was grafted when two thirds of the root of the permanent canine were visible on orthopantomography. The technique was
Data acquisition
Axial CT scans were taken immediately preoperatively, and 1 and 2 years postoperatively using a high resolution ultrafast CT scanner (Imatron Electron Beam Tomography, Siemens, Forchheim, Germany). Slices taken from the nasal tip to the occlusal plane were 1.5 mm thick with an increment of 1 mm, resulting in about 15 slices with overlapping images.
Display of images and data
All images from the CT scans were transferred to a commercially available navigation system (STN-Zeiss-Navigation System, Aalen, Germany) for volumetric analysis. Each alveolar cleft and bony bridge after 1 and 2 years were seen on the workstation monitor in multiplanar reformations using the imagedata processing software of the navigation system. The defect in the alveolar cleft and the transplanted bone were then outlined on each slice using the drawing tools of the navigation system (Fig. 1).
Ethics
The study was conducted in accordance with the moral, ethical, regulatory and scientific principles governing clinical research as set out in the Declaration of Helsinki (2004).
Results
The mean preoperative volume of the cleft defect was 1.2 (0.3) cm3, (range 0.7–1.7 cm3). The volume of residual bone in the cleft area after 1 year was 0.6 (0.4) cm3 (49%), (range 0–1.4 cm3). After two years the amount of bone remaining had decreased to 0.6 (0.4) cm3 (48%; range 0–1.3 cm3). The ratio of residual bony volume to the size of preoperative defect was 51% after one, and 50% after two, years, respectively (Table 1).
In 11 of the 20 patients the remaining bone after 1 year was less than
Discussion
Traditionally, the reported ways of evaluating alveolar bone grafts in patients with cleft lip and palate have been occlusal, periapical, or panoramic radiographs.2, 6, 16, 17 A lot of studies achieved success rates between 80% and 90% using the Oslo grading system as described by Bergland et al.5, 6, 7, 12, 18
The principle of evaluating the success of a bone graft on a two-dimensional image is that there is a significant correlation between height of the bone, calculated from two-dimensional
References (22)
- et al.
Assessment of secondary alveolar bone grafting using a modification of the Bergland grading system
Br J Plast Surg
(2003) - et al.
Secondary bone grafting in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients: indications and treatment procedure
Int J Oral Surg
(1985) Secondary alveolar bone grafting in cleft lip and palate patients
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2000)- et al.
Bone volume after secondary bone grafting in unilateral and bilateral clefts determined by computed tomography scans
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radio Endodont
(2001) - et al.
Navigational precision of drilling tools preventing damage to the mandibular canal
J Craniomaxillofac Surg
(2001) - et al.
Analysis of bone resorption after secondary alveolar cleft bone grafts before and after canine eruption in connection with orthodontic gap closure or prosthodontic treatment
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2003) - et al.
Computed tomographic evaluation of bone formation after secondary bone grafting of alveolar clefts
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(1999) Primary bone grafting in cleft of lip, alveolus and palate
- et al.
Radiographic assessment of secondary autogenous alveolar bone grafting in cleft lip and palate patients
Cleft Palate Craniofac J
(1997) - et al.
Alveolar bone grafting in patients with complete clefts: a comparative study between secondary and tertiary bone grafting
Cleft Palate Craniofac J
(2002)
Elimination of the residual alveolar cleft by secondary bone grafting and subsequent orthodontic treatment
Cleft Palate J
Cited by (88)
What is the Success Rate of Repeat Alveolar Bone Graft?
2024, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryBioglass 45S5, a relevant alternative to autogenous harvesting for secondary alveolar bone grafts in clefts? Retrospective study of one hundred surgeries
2024, Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial SurgeryComparison of Alveolar Bone Grafting Outcomes using CBCT in Individuals with UCLP Based on the Presurgical Orthodontic Treatment Methods
2024, Cleft Palate Craniofacial JournalCone Beam-CT-Based Bone Volume Assessments of Alveolar Synthetic Bone Graft GlassBONE™ in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients: A Retrospective Study
2024, Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral SurgeryEnhancing Craniofacial Bone Reconstruction with Clinically Applicable 3D Bioprinted Constructs
2024, Advanced Healthcare Materials