Original article—liver, pancreas and biliary tract
Evaluation of a Scoring System for Assessing Prognosis in Pediatric Acute Liver Failure

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2008.05.013Get rights and content

Background & Aims

Pediatric acute liver failure (PALF) results in death or need for liver transplantation (LT) in up to 50% of patients. A scoring system for predicting death or LT (Liver Injury Units [LIU] score) in PALF was previously derived by our group, and used peak values during hospital admission of total bilirubin, prothrombin time/international normalized ratio, and ammonia as significant predictors of outcome. The aims of this study were to test the predictive value of the LIU score in a subsequent validation set of patients and to derive a hospital admission LIU (aLIU) score predictive of outcome.

Methods

Data were obtained from 53 children admitted with PALF from 2002 to 2006. Outcome was defined at 16 weeks as alive without LT, death, or LT.

Results

Survival without LT at 16 weeks for each LIU score quartile was 92%, 44%, 60%, and 12%, respectively (P < .001). The receiver operating characteristic C index for predicting death or LT by 4 weeks was 86.3. An admission LIU score was derived using admission total bilirubin and prothrombin time/international normalized ratio. Survival without LT at 16 weeks for each quartile using the aLIU score was 85%, 77%, 69%, and 31% (P = .001). The receiver operating characteristic C index for predicting death or LT by 4 weeks was 83.7.

Conclusions

The original LIU score is a valid predictor of outcome in PALF. The aLIU score is promising and needs to be validated in subsequent patients.

Section snippets

Methods

The demographics and clinical course of all children admitted to The Children's Hospital in Denver who met criteria for PALF from January 2002 to December 2006 were entered prospectively into a database. This group is referred to as the validation set. The training set refers to the original data set from which the LIU score was derived. This study was reviewed and approved by the Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board. PALF was defined as acute onset of severe liver dysfunction plus the

Clinical and Outcome Data

Fifty-three patients (31 males, 22 females) were identified with PALF over 5 years. The cause of PALF was indeterminate (n = 14), sepsis/ischemia-reperfusion injury (n = 14), viral infection (n = 8), metabolic disease (n = 5), acetaminophen toxicity (n = 4), hematology/oncology-related (n = 4), and other causes (n = 4). Thirteen percent (n = 7) underwent LT, 23% (n = 12) died without LT, with an overall transplant-free survival rate of 64% at 16 weeks. There were no significant differences in

Discussion

In this study, using a second independent validation cohort of children with PALF at a single institution, the previously derived LIU score was shown to be strongly predictive of death or LT (C index, 86.3). In the validation set, the second and third quartiles showed overlap when compared with the training set of data; however, the lowest and highest quartiles clearly reflected patients with low and high likelihoods of death or LT. The predictive value was better for the LIU score using INR

References (28)

  • F.V. Schiødt et al.

    Etiology and outcome for the 295 patients with acute liver failure in the United States

    Liver Transpl Surg

    (1999)
  • W.S. Lee et al.

    Etiology, outcome and prognostic indicators of childhood fulminant hepatic failure in the United Kingdom

    J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr

    (2005)
  • A. Dhawan et al.

    Approaches to acute liver failure in children

    Pediatr Transplant

    (2004)
  • M. Ciocca et al.

    Prognostic factors in pediatric acute liver failure

    Arch Dis Child

    (2008)
  • Cited by (46)

    • Acute Liver Failure in Children

      2022, Pediatric Clinics of North America
    • Emergencies in paediatric hepatology

      2022, Journal of Hepatology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The available prognostic markers include those indicating degree of liver dysfunction, extrahepatic dysfunction, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, age and aetiology.23,25,27,28,30,95–98 The various parameters known to affect outcomes and the scoring systems (combining these parameters) that are validated in PALF are detailed in Tables S2 and S3.23–25,27,28,30,95,97–102 Median waiting times for LT vary among centres.

    • Clinical Course among Cases of Acute Liver Failure of Indeterminate Diagnosis

      2016, Journal of Pediatrics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Distilling multiple clinical and biochemical measures into a practical model that can be used at the bedside for each decision interval remains a challenge. Previous predictive models for ALF in adults and children have included clinical and biochemical measures that are objective (eg, INR, bilirubin, ammonia, age) or subjective (eg, jaundice, encephalopathy) at the time of admission to hospital, the highest recorded or “peak” value,13,14 or combinations of these data elements.2,15-17 Measures obtained only at admission are limited by their inability to account for disease progression or improvement during the ensuing days.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    B.R.L. is supported by a National Institutes of Health training grant (5T32DK067009).

    View full text