Original article—liver, pancreas and biliary tractEvaluation of a Scoring System for Assessing Prognosis in Pediatric Acute Liver Failure
Section snippets
Methods
The demographics and clinical course of all children admitted to The Children's Hospital in Denver who met criteria for PALF from January 2002 to December 2006 were entered prospectively into a database. This group is referred to as the validation set. The training set refers to the original data set from which the LIU score was derived. This study was reviewed and approved by the Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board. PALF was defined as acute onset of severe liver dysfunction plus the
Clinical and Outcome Data
Fifty-three patients (31 males, 22 females) were identified with PALF over 5 years. The cause of PALF was indeterminate (n = 14), sepsis/ischemia-reperfusion injury (n = 14), viral infection (n = 8), metabolic disease (n = 5), acetaminophen toxicity (n = 4), hematology/oncology-related (n = 4), and other causes (n = 4). Thirteen percent (n = 7) underwent LT, 23% (n = 12) died without LT, with an overall transplant-free survival rate of 64% at 16 weeks. There were no significant differences in
Discussion
In this study, using a second independent validation cohort of children with PALF at a single institution, the previously derived LIU score was shown to be strongly predictive of death or LT (C index, 86.3). In the validation set, the second and third quartiles showed overlap when compared with the training set of data; however, the lowest and highest quartiles clearly reflected patients with low and high likelihoods of death or LT. The predictive value was better for the LIU score using INR
References (28)
- et al.
Acute liver failure in infancy: a 14-year experience of a pediatric liver transplantation center
J Pediatr
(2001) - et al.
Transplantation for acute hepatic failure in children
J Pediatr Surg
(1998) - et al.
Characterization of acute liver failure and development of a continuous risk of death staging system in children
J Hepatol
(2006) - et al.
MELD score as a prognostic model for listing acute liver failure patients for liver transplantation
Transplant Proc
(2006) - et al.
Acute liver failure: clinical features, outcome analysis, and applicability of prognostic criteria
Liver Transpl
(2000) - et al.
Utility of the MAYO End-Stage Liver Disease score, King's College Criteria, and a new in-hospital mortality score in the prognosis of in-hospital mortality in acute liver failure
Transplant Proc
(2006) - et al.
Evidence-based incorporation of serum sodium concentration into MELD
Gastroenterology
(2006) - et al.
Acute liver failure in children: the first 348 patients in the pediatric acute liver failure study group
J Pediatr
(2006) - et al.
Hepatic failure and liver transplant: working group report of the Second Work Congress of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr
(2004) - et al.
Results of a prospective study of acute liver failure at 17 tertiary care centers in the United States
Ann Intern Med
(2002)
Etiology and outcome for the 295 patients with acute liver failure in the United States
Liver Transpl Surg
Etiology, outcome and prognostic indicators of childhood fulminant hepatic failure in the United Kingdom
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr
Approaches to acute liver failure in children
Pediatr Transplant
Prognostic factors in pediatric acute liver failure
Arch Dis Child
Cited by (46)
Dynamic risk score modeling for multiple longitudinal risk factors and survival
2024, Computational Statistics and Data AnalysisAcute Liver Failure in Children
2022, Pediatric Clinics of North AmericaEmergencies in paediatric hepatology
2022, Journal of HepatologyCitation Excerpt :The available prognostic markers include those indicating degree of liver dysfunction, extrahepatic dysfunction, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, age and aetiology.23,25,27,28,30,95–98 The various parameters known to affect outcomes and the scoring systems (combining these parameters) that are validated in PALF are detailed in Tables S2 and S3.23–25,27,28,30,95,97–102 Median waiting times for LT vary among centres.
Prognostic parameters of pediatric acute liver failure and the role of plasma exchange
2019, Pediatrics and NeonatologyAetiology, outcomes and prognostic indicators of paediatric acute liver failure
2018, Anales de PediatriaClinical Course among Cases of Acute Liver Failure of Indeterminate Diagnosis
2016, Journal of PediatricsCitation Excerpt :Distilling multiple clinical and biochemical measures into a practical model that can be used at the bedside for each decision interval remains a challenge. Previous predictive models for ALF in adults and children have included clinical and biochemical measures that are objective (eg, INR, bilirubin, ammonia, age) or subjective (eg, jaundice, encephalopathy) at the time of admission to hospital, the highest recorded or “peak” value,13,14 or combinations of these data elements.2,15-17 Measures obtained only at admission are limited by their inability to account for disease progression or improvement during the ensuing days.
B.R.L. is supported by a National Institutes of Health training grant (5T32DK067009).