Elsevier

The Journal of Pediatrics

Volume 166, Issue 6, June 2015, Pages 1423-1430.e2
The Journal of Pediatrics

Original Article
Treatment of Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder among Children with Special Health Care Needs

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.02.018Get rights and content

Objectives

To describe the parent-reported prevalence of treatments for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) among a national sample of children with special health care needs (CSHCN), and assess the alignment of ADHD treatment with current American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines.

Study design

Parent-reported data from the 2009-2010 National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs allowed for weighted national and state-based prevalence estimates of medication, behavioral therapy, and dietary supplement use for ADHD treatment among CSHCN aged 4-17 years with current ADHD. National estimates were compared across demographic groups, ADHD severity, and comorbidities. Medication treatment by drug class was described.

Results

Of CSHCN with current ADHD, 74.0% had received medication treatment in the past week, 44.0% had received behavioral therapy in the past year, and 10.2% used dietary supplements for ADHD in the past year. Overall, 87.3% had received past week medication treatment or past year behavioral therapy (both, 30.7%; neither, 12.7%). Among preschool-aged CSHCN with ADHD, 25.4% received medication treatment alone, 31.9% received behavioral therapy alone, 21.2% received both treatments, and 21.4% received neither treatment. Central nervous system stimulants were the most common medication class (84.8%) among CSHCN with ADHD, followed by the selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor atomoxetine (8.4%).

Conclusion

These estimates provide a benchmark of clinical practice for the period directly preceding issuance of the American Academy of Pediatrics' 2011 ADHD guidelines. Most children with ADHD received medication treatment or behavioral therapy; just under one-third received both. Multimodal treatment was most common for CSHCN with severe ADHD and those with comorbidities. Approximately one-half of preschoolers received behavioral therapy, the recommended first-line treatment for this age group.

Section snippets

Methods

The 2009-2010 National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs (NS-CSHCN) is a nationally representative, population-based telephone survey conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention with funding and direction from the Health Resources Services Administration. Data were collected between July 2009 and March 2011.12 Secondary analyses of these de-identified, existing survey data was considered exempt from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention institutional review

Results

Among all completed NS-CSHCN interviews (n = 40 242), 9459 CSHCN aged 4-17 years had current ADHD, valid responses to the ADHD treatment questions, and complete data on sex. The demographic profile of the sample and this population is presented in Table I (available at www.jpeds.com). Among all CSHCN, the weighted estimate of parent-reported current ADHD was 32.3% (95% CI, 31.5%-33.2%).

Discussion

This US study establishes the relative national prevalence of reported ADHD treatments, specifically medication treatment and behavioral therapy, as well as the use of dietary supplements for the treatment of ADHD, among CSHCN in 2009-2010. In this national sample of CSHCN, approximately 87% of children with parent-reported current ADHD were receiving either medication treatment or behavioral therapy, with an additional 1.2% receiving dietary supplements alone as an alternative treatment.

References (22)

  • J.M. Zito et al.

    Trends in the prescribing of psychotropic medications to preschoolers

    JAMA

    (2000)
  • Cited by (62)

    • Early response to SPN-812 (viloxazine extended-release) can predict efficacy outcome in pediatric subjects with ADHD: a machine learning post-hoc analysis of four randomized clinical trials

      2021, Psychiatry Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although the concept of personalized medicine has been discussed for decades (Gibson, 1971), it has not yet been implemented in ADHD, and current guidelines are based on the efficacy/tolerability tradeoff of these medications as reported in randomized controlled trials (Cortese et al., 2018; Faraone et al., 2015). Historically and currently, psychostimulants are first-line pharmacological treatments for ADHD (Faraone et al., 2015; Visser et al., 2015) with nonstimulants being considered only if both classes of stimulants fail, there is a contraindication to stimulants (e.g., a family history or currently active substance use disorder or a serious cardiovascular condition), or there are intolerable adverse effects (CONCERTA®, 2017; Faraone et al., 2020; VYVANSE®, 2018). This approach, however, does not consider inter-patient variability in the treatment response.

    • Rapid quantitative analysis of methylphenidate and ritalinic acid in oral fluid by liquid chromatography triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (LC-QqQ-MS)

      2018, Journal of Chromatography B: Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical and Life Sciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV), Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a disorder generally diagnosed in childhood (around seven years old) that meets five criteria (A–D); traditionally a “persistent pattern of inattention and/or hyperactivity-impulsivity that is more frequent and severe than is typically observed in individuals at a comparable level of development” [1]. The 2011 National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs reported that 11% of children aged 4–17 were diagnosed with ADHD by a health care provider in the United States, with 6.1% of children in that age group having been prescribed medication for treatment of ADHD [2]. In 1937, psychiatrist Charles Bradley first reported the effects of Benzedrine sulfate, an amphetamine marketed by Smith, Kline & French, on “problem” children while treating them for severe headaches, when he noted that the children showed an improved performance in school, social interactions, and emotional feedback [3].

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    S.C. receives support for research on navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation from Nextstim Oy. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or the Health Resources and Services Administration.

    View full text