Pain assessment: Current status and challenges
Introduction
Neonatal pain assessment, an essential component of neonatal care, has received increased attention over the past decade. Historically, neonatal care focused on survival; pain was not recognized or treated. Research studies from 1985 to 1992 by Anand and colleagues on pain and its effects in preterm neonates were instrumental in changing attitudes regarding neonatal pain.1, 2, 3 A survey in 1988 among English anaesthetists showed that 80% of respondents considered neonates capable of experiencing pain, but only 52% ordered opioids after surgery, highlighting the need for education and practice changes.4 A major contributor to non-treatment was the lack of objective pain assessment methods. A variety of valid and reliable pain assessment instruments have been developed over the past two decades. Yet, behavioural pain assessment remains challenging and controversial due to the lack of a gold standard for neonatal pain expression. Integration of pain assessment into daily practice remains problematic.
This paper describes behavioural, physiological and biological indicators for neonatal pain assessment and provides an overview of pain instruments and their content. The multiple challenges surrounding pain assessment and management in daily practice are delineated. The interactions between developmental care, pain assessment, and pain management are discussed.
Section snippets
Behavioural indicators
Facial expression is considered the most sensitive indicator of acute and short-term pain in neonates.5, 6, 7 Total facial activity and a cluster of specific facial features (brow bulge, eye squeeze, nasolabial furrow and open mouth) have been shown to be significantly associated with acute and postoperative pain.5, 8 An example of a unidimensional instrument focusing on facial expression is the Neonatal Facial Coding System (NFCS), which assesses ten discrete facial actions from either
Pain assessment instruments
Various pain assessment instruments have been developed, based on behavioural indicators of pain alone or a combination of behavioural and physiological indicators. Whereas combined instruments are multidimensional by nature, others tend to focus on one behavioural aspect, for instance facial expression in the NFCS.5 Most instruments have been reviewed extensively by other authors.23, 24, 25 Table 1 displays components of 16 different neonatal pain assessment instruments. There is considerable
Challenges in behavioural pain assessment
Pain assessment in the non-verbal patient of any age remains challenging despite recent progress. Physiological and behavioural pain cues might be exhibited with non-painful experiences, leading to clinical difficulties in interpreting the behaviour. Pain and agitation behaviours are difficult, if not often impossible, to differentiate. Some clinicians maintain that pain and agitation are two separate entities, and struggle to distinguish the two behaviourally. Agitation is a broad term, used
Difficulties in clinical pain assessment and management
Pain assessment in the NICU has become commonplace in the United States due to regulatory demands. However, the integration of assessment into practice remains problematic. Pain assessment is often accomplished by the bedside caregiver, usually the nurse, recorded on the medical record, but not acted on by the team. This might be partially due to the lack of evidence-based treatment protocols. Recommendations are more precise for procedural and postoperative pain than for pain in the ventilated
Concluding remarks
Clinicians are continually challenged by neonatal pain assessment and management. Currently, behavioural pain assessment is the cornerstone of pain management but scores should be tempered with common sense and sound judgement, as behavioural pain assessment remains difficult in some infants. The search for biological pain markers should continue. Research is needed to establish clinical utility and significance of existing pain tools. Pain management methods—pharmocological and
References (50)
- et al.
Pain, anaesthesia, and babies
Lancet
(1987) - et al.
Paediatric anaesthetists' perceptions of neonatal and infant pain
Pain
(1988) - et al.
Pain in the preterm neonate: behavioural and physiological indices
Pain
(1993) - et al.
Neonatal facial and cry responses to invasive and non-invasive procedures
Pain
(1990) - et al.
Bedside application of the Neonatal Facial Coding System in pain assessment of premature neonates
Pain
(1998) - et al.
Pain assessment in the neonate using the Bernese Pain Scale for Neonates
Early Hum Dev
(2004) - et al.
Multidimensional pain assessment in premature neonates: a pilot study
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs
(1993) - et al.
Methodological considerations for the use of heart rate variability as a measure of pain reactivity in vulnerable infants
Clin Perinatol
(2002) - et al.
The association between physiological and behavioral pain measures in 0- to 3-year-old infants after major surgery
J Pain Symptom Manage
(2001) - et al.
Physiological, hormonal, and behavioral responses to a single fentanyl dose in intubated and ventilated preterm neonates
J Pediatr
(1998)
Measurement of neonatal responses to painful stimuli: a research review
J Pain Symptom Manage
Analgesia and anesthesia for neonates: study design and ethical issues
Clin Ther
Effects of morphine analgesia in ventilated preterm neonates: primary outcomes from the NEOPAIN randomised trial
Lancet
Developmental changes in pain expression in premature, full-term, two- and four-month-old infants
Pain
Treat the babies, not their stress responses
Lancet
Biologic markers of pain in the vulnerable infant
Clin Perinatol
Anesthesia and analgesia during and after surgery
Clin Ther
Analgesia and sedation during mechanical ventilation in neonates
Clin Ther
Analgesia and local anesthesia during invasive procedures in the neonate
Clin Ther
Developmental care decreases physiologic and behavioral pain expression in preterm neonates
J Pain
Are there developmentally distinct motor indicators of pain in preterm infants?
Early Hum Dev
Pain and its effects in the human neonate and fetus
N Engl J Med
Halothane-morphine compared with high-dose sufentanil for anesthesia and postoperative analgesia in neonatal cardiac surgery
N Engl J Med
Facial activity as a measure of neonatal pain expression
The facial display of pain
Cited by (112)
Investigating the psychometric properties of the Persian version of Neonatal Pain, agitation, and sedation scale
2022, Pediatrics and NeonatologyThe clinical utility of the pain assessment tool in ventilated, sedated, and muscle-relaxed neonates
2021, Australian Critical CareAssessment of pain in newborn infants
2019, Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal MedicineCitation Excerpt :For example, every performed pain assessment should lead to a discussion and decision regarding next steps in clinical decisions to reduce pain, otherwise the assessment merely represents a number on a chart rather than guiding care. The use of a flowchart or algorithm is a helpful tool to ensure that all infants receive adequate pain management, irrespectively who performed the assessment or who has the medical responsibility on that shift [112]. It is also advisable to perform audits or benchmarking on regular basis, to ensure that the unit maintains compliance with the guidelines [113].
ECG Feature-Based Classification of Induced Pain Levels
2024, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)