Journal Information
Vol. 54. Issue 1.
Pages 1-3 (1 January 2001)
Vol. 54. Issue 1.
Pages 1-3 (1 January 2001)
Full text access
Investigación pediátrica en Europa
Visits
5763
A.M. Weindling
Corresponding author
a.m.weindling@liverpool.ac.uk

Correspondencia: Neonatal Unit. Liverpool Women's Hospital. Crown Street. Liverpool L8 7SS, UK. Tel. +44 1517024055. Fax. +44 1517024082
Professor of Perinatal Medicine. Department of Child Health. University of Liverpool. Reino Unido. Secretario de la Sociedad Europea de Investigación Pediátrica (ESPR)
This item has received
Article information
Full text is only available in PDF
Bibliografía
[1.]
C. Stiller.
Survival of patients in clinical trials and at specialist.
Introducing new treatments for cancer: practical, ethical and legal problems, pp. 119-136
[2.]
W.A. Silverman.
Where's the evidence? Debates in modern medicine.
[3.]
R.B. Redmon.
How children can be respected as “ends” yet still be used as subjects in non-therapeutic research.
J Med Ethics, 12 (1986), pp. 77-82
[4.]
B. Freedman, A. Fuks, C. Weijer.
In loco parentis. Minimal risk as an ethical threshold for research upon children.
Hastings Center Report, 23 (1993), pp. 13-19
[5.]
N. Modi.
Informed consent difficult in paediatric intensive care.
BMJ, 307 (1993), pp. 1495
[6.]
J.S. Tobias, R.L. Souhami.
Fully informed consent can be needlessly cruel.
BMJ, 307 (1993), pp. 1199-1201
[7.]
N. McIntosh.
Strengthen ethical committees' role.
BMJ, 307 (1993), pp. 1496
[8.]
C. Foster.
Why do research ethics committees disagree with each other?.
J Royal Coll Physicians, 29 (1995), pp. 315-318
Copyright © 2001. Asociación Española de Pediatría
Download PDF
Idiomas
Anales de Pediatría (English Edition)
Article options
Tools