Journal Information
Vol. 93. Issue 1.
Pages 52-54 (01 July 2020)
Vol. 93. Issue 1.
Pages 52-54 (01 July 2020)
Scientific letter
Open Access
Adhesive sutures using cyanoacrylate in pleural drains of premature infants
Suturas adhesivas mediante cianoacrilato en drenajes pleurales de prematuros
Visits
4131
Inmaculada Lara-Cantóna, Pilar Sáenz-Gonzálezb, Ana García-Roblesc, Maria Dolores Lorena Mocholí-Tomásd, Álvaro Solaz-Garcíaa,
Corresponding author
alvarosogar@gmail.com

Corresponding author.
a Grupo Investigación Perinatología, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain
b Servicio de Neonatología, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain
c PharmD, Grupo de Investigación Perinatología, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain
d Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos Neonatales, Servicio deNeonatología, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain
This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (1)
Tables (1)
Table 1. Patient characteristics.
Full Text
Dear Editor:

Cyanoacrylates are tissue adhesives used to join tissues. From a chemical perspective, they belong to the alkyl cyanoacrylate family and are differentiated by their side chain composition.1,2 Specifically, Histoacryl® consists of n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate and is indicated for wound closure, sclerotherapy and mesh fixation. In its liquid state, it is a monomeric compound that polymerises on application to tissue, forming a three-dimensional network that keeps tissue edges together. The advantages of using cyanoacrylates as opposed to conventional suturing include their easy application, minimal scar formation and that they form a bacteriostatic, haemostatic, waterproof, and biodegradable barrier.1–3

Cyanoacrylates have been widely used as an alternative option for wound closure in adult and paediatric patients, especially in emergency settings or in delicate areas such as the face, as they do not require the use of local anaesthesia required for suturing, are quicker to use, are less painful, cause less redness, are associated with a lower rate of infection and achieve better cosmetic outcomes. All of the above make their use cost-effective.4

There are few studies in the literature concerning the use of these adhesives in newborn infants. Tissue adhesive has been used for creating stomas in very low birth weight preterm infants with good results,5 and was used to close a bronchopleural fistula in a full-term newborn.6

In the field of neonatology, the traditional approach to closure after removal of a chest drains was the purse string suture, which had poor cosmetic outcomes. Later on, a new approach was used to close the wound caused by placement of the chest drain with one or two silk suture stitches to prevent recurrence of the pneumothorax or persistence of the fistula. This is a painful and stressful procedure that requires sedation and analgesia, which have side effects in newborns that cannot be overlooked. Furthermore, its cosmetic effects are also not ideal.4,5

The use of cyanoacrylates allows an easier and less invasive closure of wound edges. Thus, it reduces the pain of closure and therefore the amount of sedation and analgesia needed for the procedure. Another advantage is the improved cosmetic outcomes compared to traditional sutures. Following the report of positive outcomes in paediatric studies,4–6 the use of these adhesives was proposed for closure of insertion sites after removal of chest drains in newborn infants (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

A-E) Caso 2-B: A) Right-sided chest drain. B) Removal of drain and closure with liquid tissue adhesive. C) 24 h after closure. D) 48 h after closure. E and F) Case 1: E) 1 week after closure. F) 30 days after closure.

(0.15MB).

We present a series of cases of wound closure with a cyanoacrylate adhesive following removal of 4 chest drains in 3 preterm infants. Table 1 summarises the demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients and the characteristics of the chest drainage procedure. The patients had been born at a gestational age of 30–36 weeks with birth weights ranging from 1330 to 3080 g. The indications for pigtail catheter placement for chest drainage were pneumothorax and chylothorax, and the duration of drainage ranged from 4 to 12 days. We observed no complications related to the chest drain or wound closure.

Table 1.

Patient characteristics.

  Case 1  Case 2-A  Case 2-B  Case 3 
GA (weeks)  30+1  30+1  30+1  36+4 
Birth weight (g)  1330 g  1650 g  1650 g  3080 g 
Type of ventilation  CMV/NIV  HFV/CMV  HFV/CMV  NIV/Spo 
[0,1–5]Drainage
Reason for drainage  Congenital chylothorax  Hydrops fetalis  Hydrops fetalis  Pneumothorax 
Location  5th ICS-Left  5th ICS-Left  5th ICS-Right  6th ICS-Right 
Days post birth 
Duration in days  12 
Pig-tail catheter calibre  10 Fr  10 Fr  10 Fr  10 Fr 
Suction  No  No  No  Yes (−20 cmH2O) 
Complications  No  No  No  No 
Type of suture  Histoacryl®  Histoacryl®  Histoacryl®  Histoacryl® 
Complications of tissue adhesive suture  None  None  None  None 

GA, gestational age; ICS, intercostal space.

Type of ventilation: CMV, conventional mechanical ventilation; HFV, high-frequency ventilation; NIV, non-invasive ventilation; Spo, spontaneous.

Drainage complications: accidental removal, infection, displacement, obstruction.

Closure complications: irritation, wound dehiscence, adhesions, delayed healing, pigmentation, hypertrophic scars and keloids.

At the time of this writing, the follow-up has continued through discharge (2 months), and we plan to complete the follow-up at age 1 year. To date, we have not observed any complications of this sutureless closure, acute (such as erythema, wound dehiscence, adhesions, delayed wound healing) or chronic (hyperpigmentation, hypertrophic scars or keloids).

In this series of 4 cases, the outcomes of this innovative closure technique were good, with good cosmetic results and no complications in the short and medium term, so we believe that cyanoacrylates can be considered a good alternative to traditional silk sutures for closure of chest drain incisions in newborns. Since the sample was small and there was no control group, additional studies with long-term patient follow-up are required to corroborate our findings.

Acknowledgments

We especially thank the parents of newborns that gave us consent to take photographs. We also thank all the professionals that routinely care for newborns at the NICU of the Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia.

References
[1]
J.M. González González.
Cianoacrilato: definición y propiedades. Toxicidad y efectos secundarios. Aplicaciones en medicina y odontología.
Av Odontoestomatol, 28 (2012), pp. 95-102
[2]
A. Cáceres Barreno, C. Cava Vergiú, J. Robello Malatto, E. Alberca Ramos, J. Rodríguez Chessa.
Biocompatibilidad del cianoacrilato de butilo en suturas en piel en comparación con las suturas convencionales.
Rev Odont Mex, 17 (2013), pp. 81-90
[3]
J.Y. Kwon, H.G. Yun, I.Y. Park.
n-Butyl-2-cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive (Histoacryl) vs. subcuticular sutures for skin closure of Pfannenstiel incisions following cesarean delivery.
PLoS One, (2018), pp. 13
[4]
K.J. Farion, K.F. Russell, M.H. Osmond, L. Hartling, T.P. Klassen, T. Durec, B. Vandermeer.
Tissue adhesives for traumatic lacerations in children and adults.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev, (2001), pp. 4
[5]
S. Nose, T. Sasaki, R. Saka, K. Minagawa, H. Okuyama.
A sutureless technique using cyanoacrylate adhesives when creating a stoma for extremely low birth weight infants.
SpringerPlus, 5 (2016), pp. 189
[6]
M.S. Saleemi, C. McLaren, B.K. Sharma, N. Muthialu, D. Roebuck, C. Ng.
Bronchopleural fistula in a newborn undergoing ECMO-transbronchial closure.
J Perinatol, 33 (2013), pp. 659-660

Please cite this article as: Lara-Cantón I, Sáenz-González P, García-Robles A, Mocholí-Tomás MDL, Solaz-García Á. Suturas adhesivas mediante cianoacrilato en drenajes pleurales de prematuros. An Pediatr (Barc). 2020;93:52–54.

Copyright © 2020. Asociación Española de Pediatría
Idiomas
Anales de Pediatría (English Edition)
Article options
Tools
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?