Journal Information
Vol. 83. Issue 1.
Pages 55-56 (1 July 2015)
Vol. 83. Issue 1.
Pages 55-56 (1 July 2015)
Scientific Letter
Full text access
Vaginal reflux: A forgotten cause of diurnal incontinence in prepubertal girls
Reflujo vaginal: una causa olvidada de incontinencia diurna en niñas prepúberes
Visits
16327
M. Fernandez Ibieta
Corresponding author
mfndezibieta@hotmail.com

Corresponding author.
, G. Zambudio Carmona, I. Martinez Castaño, M.J. Guirao Piñera, J.I. Ruiz Jimenez
Sección de Urología Pediátrica, Servicio de Cirugía Pediátrica, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
This item has received
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (2)
Full Text
To the Editor,

Most cases of daytime incontinence in prepubertal girls have a functional aetiology, although a neurogenic dysfunction must always be ruled out. Vaginal reflux (VR) or intravaginal urination has been recognised as a cause of urinary incontinence with post void dribbling in prepubertal girls.1,2 The reverse flow of urine into the vagina can sometimes be perceived in a retrograde voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG), even in a standing position. This finding, which is frequent in prepubertal girls,1 may be asymptomatic or accompanied by symptoms such as diurnal incontinence and recurrent vulvovaginitis.3 Incontinence is characterised by loss of urine in the daytime (accompanied by enuresis in some cases) usually soon after urinating (post void dribbling) due to the progressive emptying of the vagina.1,3

We present 3 cases of VR that showed the usual clinical features of exclusively diurnal incontinence.

Case 1. Girl, 7 years of age, with overweight and symptoms of diurnal incontinence consisting of post void dribbling without enuresis. She reported occasional urgency and 3–4 episodes a year of afebrile urinary tract infection (UTI). We performed an ultrasound and a VCUG, with normal results. A uroflowmetry and urodynamic assessment were performed and showed no signs of pathology (coordinated urination without residual urine, no overactivity, correct voiding). Two filling cystometries were performed, the second of which (with the patient in a seated position) revealed a leakage that had not been detected in the first one. At first we considered the possibility of sphincter deficiency and we performed a magnetic resonance imaging study of the lumbosacral spine that showed no abnormalities. We reassessed the patient, reviewed the imaging tests, and found signs of VR in the VCUG (Fig. 1). This finding led to the prescription of urotherapy, and the symptoms resolved in 6 months.

Figure 1.

Case 1. Double outline in the late voiding film of the VCUG that shows a partially filled bladder with a superimposed round outline (more radiopaque) corresponding to the vagina.

(0.07MB).

Case 2. Girl, 9 years of age with diurnal incontinence and lower UTIs. She had received previous treatment with oxybutynin for suspected overactive bladder and showed no response to it. Uroflowmetry with electromyography revealed uncoordinated voiding, leading to the initiation of a biofeedback programme that had poor results despite improvement in the uroflowmetry tracings. It was decided to perform VCUG, which revealed VR (Fig. 2). Urotherapy specific to VR was initiated. Six months after starting treatment, the patient stopped having urine leaks.

Figure 2.

Case 2. Double outline of the bladder neck in the late voiding film. The image shows the presence of contrast medium in the vagina (posterior to the urethra).

(0.07MB).

Case 3. Girl, 7 years of age with sporadic dribbling and lower UTI. She had voiding postponement and decreased voiding frequency. Urotherapy was the only treatment prescribed. The patient did not show significant improvement by the following visit, so VCUG and ultrasound examinations were ordered, which revealed VR. There was evidence of low compliance with urotherapy, so we reinforced it with close monitoring by the nursing staff, stressing the importance of good toilet posture. The girl became asymptomatic after one year of followup.

Vaginal reflux may be the cause of incontinence in 12–15% of prepubertal girls with urine leakage.1,3–6 The diagnosis may be difficult if this possibility is not taken into account, requiring a multitude of diagnostic tests. It is common for voiding films taken during VCUG not to be examined in detail, as the emphasis is often placed on ruling out anatomical anomalies of the bladder and vesicoureteral reflux, and some paediatric radiologists are not familiar enough with VR. A bladder diary along with a structured history-taking usually reveals a pattern of incontinence, typically diurnal, post void dribbling (5–10min after urination) of a small volume,3 but large enough to require changes of clothing or some form of protection (such as sanitary pads). The genital anatomy in VR is completely normal and urine reflux from the urinary meatus to the vagina occurs when the legs are not spread during urination, the labia majora pose a barrier to the free flow of urine from the meatus, forcing the urine to flow back into the vagina.2–6 The habit of keeping the legs closed when sitting in the toilet obstructs the free flow of urine. Another factor that contributes to this reverse flow is the more horizontal vagina of prepubertal girls. This pattern is common in girls with an overactive bladder and “crossed legs” and in obese patients, and may play a role in recurrent vulvovaginitis.3

Once intravaginal reflux is identified, the treatment is satisfying. It consists of a urotherapy programme based on frequent or scheduled voidings, every 3h, adapted to family and school life, with a correct toilet position spreading the legs and leaning forward, or straddled on the toilet in the position opposite to normal (facing the wall), devoting enough time to urination (one minute or “counting to sixty”),1–6 with double voiding to try to empty any residual urine.7

References
[1]
I. Chiang, S. Shei-Dei Yang, S.J. Chang.
Pathophysiology of daytime urinary incontinence in children incont.
Pelvic Floor Dysfunct, 5 (2011), pp. 107-110
[2]
P.F. Austin, S.B. Bauer, W. Coger, J. Chase, I. Franco, P. Hoebeke, et al.
The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function in children and adolescents: update report from the Standardization Committee of the Internacional Children's Continence Society.
J Urol, 191 (2014), pp. 1863-1865
[3]
S. Mattsson, G. Gladh.
Urethrovaginal reflux—a common cause of daytime incontinence in girls.
Pediatrics, 111 (2003), pp. 136-139
[4]
N. Haouas, G. Cariou.
Urethrovaginal reflux during micturition: a case report.
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris), 35 (2006), pp. 621-623
[5]
D.W. Wolthuis, T.W. de Vries.
Urethrovaginal reflux as a cause of urinary incontinence in girls.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd, 151 (2007), pp. 2466-2468
[6]
M. Bernasconi, A. Borsani, L. Garzoni, G. Siegenthaler, M. Bianchetti, M. Rizzi.
Vaginal voiding: a common cause of daytime urinary leakage in girls.
J Pediatr Adoles Gynecol, 6 (2009), pp. 347-350
[7]
R. Luque Mialdea, R. Martín-Crespo Izquierdo.
Uroterapia. En Urodinámica Pediátrica paso a paso.
1.ª ed., Luque y Martín Editores, (2014), pp. 253-287

Please cite this article as: Fernandez Ibieta M, Zambudio Carmona G, Martinez Castaño I, Guirao Piñera MJ, Ruiz Jimenez JI. Reflujo vaginal: una causa olvidada de incontinencia diurna en niñas prepúberes. Ann Pediatr (Barc). 2015;83:55–56.

Copyright © 2014. Asociación Española de Pediatría
Download PDF
Idiomas
Anales de Pediatría (English Edition)
Article options
Tools
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?